A randomized comparison of oral mifepristone to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes beyond 36 weeks' gestation
- PMID: 15695985
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.058
A randomized comparison of oral mifepristone to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes beyond 36 weeks' gestation
Abstract
Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the use of oral mifepristone with intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at 36 weeks' or greater gestational age.
Study design: Sixty-five women with spontaneous PROM were randomly assigned to receive orally administered mifepristone or oxytocin infusion. Two hundred milligrams of mifepristone was administered, and subjects were observed for 18 hours, or intravenous oxytocin was administered.
Results: Thirty-three women received mifepristone and 32 received oxytocin. The average interval from start of induction to delivery was 1194.1 +/- 568.7 minutes for mifepristone-treated subjects and 770.8 +/- 519.9 minutes for oxytocin-treated subjects ( P = .001, log-transformed data). Of 33 mifepristone-treated subjects and 32 oxytocin-treated subjects, 25 (78.1%) and 17 (51.5%), respectively, achieved successful induction (defined as vaginal delivery within 24 hours) (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.96, P = .01). There was more fetal distress in the mifepristone-treated group (9 vs 2, RR 4.36, 95% CI 1.02-18.66, P = .02), and a trend toward more cesarean births (7 vs 3, RR 2.26, 95% CI 0.64-7.99, P = .19). Eleven infants of mifepristone-treated women (33.3%) and 3 infants of oxytocin-treated women (9.4%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (RR 3.56, 95% CI 1.09-11.58, P = .02).
Conclusion: Oral mifepristone administration 18 hours before oxytocin infusion did not improve labor stimulation in women with PROM near term, and was associated with more adverse fetal outcomes.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.045. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15284771 Clinical Trial.
-
Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70256-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. PMID: 9704771 Clinical Trial.
-
Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group.N Engl J Med. 1996 Apr 18;334(16):1005-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199604183341601. N Engl J Med. 1996. PMID: 8598837 Clinical Trial.
-
Controversies: premature rupture of membranes at term--no advantage of delaying induction > 24 hours.J Perinat Med. 1996;24(6):573-9. J Perinat Med. 1996. PMID: 9120740 Review.
-
Controversies: prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: the case for expectant management.J Perinat Med. 1996;24(6):563-72. J Perinat Med. 1996. PMID: 9120739 Review.
Cited by
-
Mifepristone for induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD002865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002865.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 19588336 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Oral Mifepristone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor.Cureus. 2024 Jul 26;16(7):e65450. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65450. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39184680 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources