Do sagittal plane anatomical variations (angulation) of the cervical facets and C2 odontoid affect the geometrical configuration of the cervical lordosis?
- PMID: 15696531
- DOI: 10.1002/ca.20064
Do sagittal plane anatomical variations (angulation) of the cervical facets and C2 odontoid affect the geometrical configuration of the cervical lordosis?
Abstract
Anthropometric and statistical evaluation of measurements from digitization of 252 lateral cervical radiographs were used to investigate any correlation between radiographic measurements of cervical lordosis with sagittal plane facet angulation, articular pillar height, and inclination of the C2 odontoid with respect to the body of C2. Some researchers have hypothesized that facet and odontoid architecture variations can cause a reduction in cervical lordosis. To evaluate this hypothesis, the posterior aspect of the C2 dens, vertebral body corners, and superior and inferior facet surfaces of C2-C7 were digitized on 252 lateral cervical X-rays to calculate global angle, segmental angles, dens angle, facet angles, and facet height. No correlation between facet angle, articular pillar height, and cervical curve was found. Similarly, no correlation between the sagittal angle of the dens and any angle of cervical curvature was identified. There was correlation between the global ARA C2-C7 angle and the Cobb angles at C1-C7 (r = 0.71) and C2-C7 (r = 0.82). There was correlation between the global inclination of the atlas vertebral angle (APL) and the Cobb angle at C1-C7 (r = 0.66), Cobb angle at C2-C7 (r = 0.39), ARA C2-C7 (r = 0.42), and anterior translation of C2 compared to C7 (r = -0.46). Because no correlation between cervical facet and odontoid architecture and any segmental or global angle of cervical lordosis was found, conservative and surgical rehabilitative techniques aimed at the reduction of sagittal cervical deformities do not need to account for a patient's architecture of the cervical facets nor odontoid.
Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Modeling of the sagittal cervical spine as a method to discriminate hypolordosis: results of elliptical and circular modeling in 72 asymptomatic subjects, 52 acute neck pain subjects, and 70 chronic neck pain subjects.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 15;29(22):2485-92. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144449.90741.7c. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15543059
-
Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.018. Spine J. 2007. PMID: 17321972
-
Quantitative anatomy of the cervical facet and the posterior projection of its inferior facet.J Spinal Disord. 1997 Aug;10(4):308-16. J Spinal Disord. 1997. PMID: 9278916
-
A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Jul-Aug;19(6):398-405. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996. PMID: 8864971 Review.
-
The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Nov-Dec;16(9):591-4. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993. PMID: 8133194 Review.
Cited by
-
Odontoid Incidence: A Novel Cervical Parameter Influencing Cervical Alignment From Top to Bottom.Neurospine. 2022 Jun;19(2):463-471. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244220.110. Epub 2022 Jun 30. Neurospine. 2022. PMID: 35793937 Free PMC article.
-
Segment-specific association between cervical pillar hyperplasia (CPH) and degenerative joint disease (DJD).Chiropr Osteopat. 2006 Sep 13;14:21. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-14-21. Chiropr Osteopat. 2006. PMID: 16970812 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous