The safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate foam 1% versus clindamycin phosphate topical gel 1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris
- PMID: 15696985
The safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate foam 1% versus clindamycin phosphate topical gel 1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris
Abstract
Clindamycin phosphate is the most widely used topical antibacterial agent for acne treatment. Treatment of patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris with a new foam formulation (clindamycin foam, CF) for 12 weeks was at least as effective as clindamycin gel (CG) based on the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score. CF was superior to CG based on the reduction from baseline in total (P = .0014), inflammatory (P = .0478), and noninflammatory (P = .0037) acne lesion counts. Additionally, CF achieved efficacy that was superior to that of vehicle foam based on ISGA score (P = .0025) and all 3 lesion counts (all P < .05). Adverse experiences in the active treatment groups were mild or moderate and transient in nature. Thus the foam formulation of clindamycin is a safe and effective acne treatment; the unique foam delivery vehicle may offer cosmetic benefits to the patient and thus increase compliance.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and vehicle-controlled study.J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Dec;10(12):1382-96. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011. PMID: 22134562 Clinical Trial.
-
Results of a randomised, multicentre study comparing a new water-based gel of clindamycin 1% versus clindamycin 1% topical solution in the treatment of acne vulgaris.Eur J Dermatol. 2005 Jul-Aug;15(4):274-8. Eur J Dermatol. 2005. PMID: 16048758 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of the fixed 1.2% clindamycin phosphate, 0.025% tretinoin gel formulation (Velac) and a proprietary 0.025% tretinoin gel formulation (Aberela) in the topical control of facial acne.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1998 Nov;11(3):227-33. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1998. PMID: 9883434 Clinical Trial.
-
A new treatment for acne vulgaris combining benzoyl peroxide with clindamycin.J Drugs Dermatol. 2002 Sep;1(2):153-7. J Drugs Dermatol. 2002. PMID: 12847739 Review.
-
Clinical safety and efficacy studies of a novel formulation combining 1.2% clindamycin phosphate and 0.025% tretinoin for the treatment of acne vulgaris.J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Jun;6(6):607-15. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007. PMID: 17668526 Review.
Cited by
-
Foam-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Skin Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2025 Apr 4;26(4):102. doi: 10.1208/s12249-025-03098-4. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2025. PMID: 40185995 Review.
-
Benefits of the Dermocosmetic Mineral 89 Probiotic Fractions Adjunct to Topical Retinoids for Anti-Aging Benefits.Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Feb 10;16:375-385. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S396952. eCollection 2023. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023. PMID: 36798538 Free PMC article.
-
Body image disturbance in patients with acne vulgaris.J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Jul;4(7):35-41. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011. PMID: 21779418 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring acne using Coproporphyrin III, Protoporphyrin IX, and lesion-specific inflammation: an exploratory study.Arch Dermatol Res. 2017 Apr;309(3):159-167. doi: 10.1007/s00403-017-1718-3. Epub 2017 Feb 8. Arch Dermatol Res. 2017. PMID: 28180934 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical