Dielectrophoretic manipulation of finite sized species and the importance of the quadrupolar contribution
- PMID: 15697536
- DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066617
Dielectrophoretic manipulation of finite sized species and the importance of the quadrupolar contribution
Abstract
Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is the movement of polarizable species in a nonuniform electric field. DEP is used to attract (positive DEP) to or repel from (negative DEP) regions of high field intensity and is useful for manipulating species, including biological species. Current theoretical and numerical approaches used to predict the response to DEP forces assume that the target species is a point particle; however, in practice, the target species is of finite size, e.g., macromolecules, spores and assay beads. To elucidate the importance of target species size effects, higher order terms in the DEP force multipole expansion must be considered [Electrophoresis 23, 1973 (2002)]]. In this paper, we used the method of Green's function to derive and explore the importance of the quadrupolar contribution to the DEP forces acting on finite-sized species produced by a planar, interdigitated array of electrodes. Based on the analysis, it was found, for example, that at a fixed height of 20 mum in an interdigitated DEP array with an electrode width and spacing of 20 mum energized by a 10 Vp p, 1.0 MHz ac signal, the quadrupolar contribution to the total DEP force was 5% for a latex bead with 4.2 mum in radius and 10% for the one with 6 mum in radius. For a fixed, fractional quadrupolar contribution, beta , both the exact calculation and the scaling estimate elucidate that the critical size of particle increase linearly with the electrode width (and spacing) at a fixed height, while the critical particle radius increases with a square-root dependence on the width height above the electrode in the electrode array.
Similar articles
-
Dual frequency dielectrophoresis with interdigitated sidewall electrodes for microfluidic flow-through separation of beads and cells.Electrophoresis. 2009 Mar;30(5):782-91. doi: 10.1002/elps.200800637. Electrophoresis. 2009. PMID: 19197906
-
Experimental study of dielectrophoresis and liquid dielectrophoresis mechanisms for particle capture in a droplet.Electrophoresis. 2011 Jun;32(11):1337-47. doi: 10.1002/elps.201000548. Epub 2011 Apr 28. Electrophoresis. 2011. PMID: 21538398
-
Dielectrophoretic manipulation of macromolecules: the electric field.Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Aug;64(2 Pt 2):026605. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026605. Epub 2001 Jul 18. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001. PMID: 11497728
-
Dielectrophoretic separation of bioparticles in microdevices: a review.Electrophoresis. 2014 Mar;35(5):691-713. doi: 10.1002/elps.201300424. Epub 2014 Feb 4. Electrophoresis. 2014. PMID: 24338825 Review.
-
A review of polystyrene bead manipulation by dielectrophoresis.RSC Adv. 2019 Feb 8;9(9):4963-4981. doi: 10.1039/c8ra09017c. eCollection 2019 Feb 5. RSC Adv. 2019. PMID: 35514668 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Electromagnetic Forces and Torques: From Dielectrophoresis to Optical Tweezers.Chem Rev. 2023 Jan 31;123(4):1680-711. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00576. Online ahead of print. Chem Rev. 2023. PMID: 36719985 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A mathematical model of dielectrophoretic data to connect measurements with cell properties.Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019 Apr;411(10):2223-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-01757-7. Epub 2019 Mar 16. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019. PMID: 30879117 Free PMC article.
-
Label-free cell separation and sorting in microfluidic systems.Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 Aug;397(8):3249-67. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3721-9. Epub 2010 Apr 25. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010. PMID: 20419490 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Elucidating the DEP phenomena using a volumetric polarization approach with consideration of the electric double layer.Biomicrofluidics. 2017 Mar 22;11(2):024106. doi: 10.1063/1.4979014. eCollection 2017 Mar. Biomicrofluidics. 2017. PMID: 28396710 Free PMC article.