Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan;71(1 Pt 2):016703.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016703. Epub 2005 Jan 12.

Structure of positive decompositions of exponential operators

Affiliations

Structure of positive decompositions of exponential operators

Siu A Chin. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Apr;73(4 Pt 2):049906

Abstract

The solution of many physical evolution equations can be expressed as an exponential of two or more operators acting on initial data. Accurate solutions can be systematically derived by decomposing the exponential in a product form. For time-reversible equations, such as the Hamilton or the Schrödinger equation, it is immaterial whether or not the decomposition coefficients are positive. In fact, most symplectic algorithms for solving classical dynamics contain some negative coefficients. For time-irreversible systems, such as the Fokker-Planck equation or the quantum statistical propagator, only positive-coefficient decompositions, which respect the time-irreversibility of the diffusion kernel, can yield practical algorithms. These positive time steps only, forward decompositions, are a highly effective class of factorization algorithms. This work presents a framework for understanding the structure of these algorithms. By a suitable representation of the factorization coefficients, we show that specific error terms and order conditions can be solved analytically. Using this framework, we can go beyond the Sheng-Suzuki theorem and derive a lower bound for the error coefficient e(VTV). By generalizing the framework perturbatively, we can further prove that it is not possible to have a sixth-order forward algorithm by including only the commutator [VTV] tripple bond [V, [T,V]]. The pattern of these higher-order forward algorithms is that in going from the (2n)th to the (2n+2)th order, one must include a different commutator [V T(2n-1)V] in the decomposition process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in