Competition for representation is mediated by relative attentional salience
- PMID: 15698824
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.09.001
Competition for representation is mediated by relative attentional salience
Abstract
The biased competition model of attentional selection proposes that objects compete with one another for neural representation, with the competition rooted in stimulus and attentionally-based salience. Two experiments explore how the salience of a target item relative to flanking items impacts the speed of target identification. The results of two experiments suggest that spatially proximal items compete for shared, spatially dependent processing resources. In both experiments, subjects identified target elements embedded in multi-element displays. In Experiment 1, attentional salience was manipulated by using abrupt onsets (high-salience) and non-onsets (low-salience). Target identifications were slowest when the target was flanked by two high-salience stimuli (abrupt onsets) and fastest when the target was flanked by two low-salience items, (non-onsets). In Experiment 2, the attentional salience of display items was set through a probability manipulation involving the color of the target. The results mirrored those of Experiment 1, consistent with predictions of the biased competition model.
Similar articles
-
The role of salience in localized attentional interference.Vision Res. 2004;44(13):1575-88. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.015. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15126066
-
Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.Vision Res. 2009 May;49(11):1472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Mar 14. Vision Res. 2009. PMID: 19289140
-
When motor attention improves selective attention: the dissociating role of saliency.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jul;63(7):1387-97. doi: 10.1080/17470210903380806. Epub 2009 Nov 17. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010. PMID: 19921595
-
Attention and competition in figure-ground perception.Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:1-13. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17601-X. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19733746 Review.
-
Behavioral approaches to the assessment of attention in animals.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998 Aug;138(3-4):231-59. doi: 10.1007/s002130050668. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998. PMID: 9725746 Review.
Cited by
-
Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(2):175-88. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1141-7. Epub 2007 Oct 6. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 17922117
-
Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3346-7. Epub 2012 Nov 28. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23187885
-
When emotion blinds: a spatiotemporal competition account of emotion-induced blindness.Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 7;3:438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00438. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 23162497 Free PMC article.
-
Biased competition and visual search: the role of luminance and size contrast.Psychol Res. 2008 Jan;72(1):106-13. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0077-z. Epub 2006 Aug 8. Psychol Res. 2008. PMID: 16897098
-
Visual mismatch negativity to vanishing parts of objects in younger and older adults.PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0188929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188929. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29228033 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources