Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004;21(2):53-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF02484510.

Immunohistochemical analysis of the mutant epidermal growth factor, deltaEGFR, in glioblastoma

Affiliations

Immunohistochemical analysis of the mutant epidermal growth factor, deltaEGFR, in glioblastoma

Ryo Nishikawa et al. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2004.

Abstract

The naturally occurring mutated form of the epidermal growth factor receptor, deltaEGFR (also named EGFRvIII and de2-7EGFR), greatly enhances glioblastoma (GBM) cell growth in vivo through several activities, such as down-regulating p27 and up-regulating BclX(L) while increasing signaling through the RAS-MAPK and PI3-K cascades. More than half of GBMs, especially of the de novo type, overexpress EGFR, and 50%-70% of these express deltaEGFR. However, little is known about the distribution of deltaEGFR-expressing tumor cells within surgical specimens. In order to address this clinically important issue, we performed immunohistochemical analyses of 53 GBMs obtained during surgery using the anti- deltaEGFR monoclonal antibody, DH8.3. We also simultaneously analyzed wild-type EGFR expression in these tissues using the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, EGFR.113. deltaEGFR and wild-type EGFR expression were observed in 20/53 (38%) and 29/53 (55%), respectively. Nineteen (95%) of the deltaEGFR-positive tumors also expressed wild-type EGFR; one case was deltaEGFR-positive but wild-type EGFR-negative. In 13/20 (65%) of the deltaEGFR-positive tumors, tumor cells were scattered diffusely within the tumors, 6/20 showed geographical distribution of deltaEGFR-positive tumor cells, and one case showed homogeneous staining. In the wild-type EGFR-positive cases, almost all tumor cells expressed EGFR. The differential distribution of cells expressing the two receptors observed here may suggest either that deltaEGFR arises at a low frequency from wild-type EGFR-expressing cells, perhaps during the process of gene amplification, or that there is a paracrine-type of interaction between them.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances