Perils of paradigm: complexity, policy design, and the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
- PMID: 15701170
- PMCID: PMC549529
- DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-4-2
Perils of paradigm: complexity, policy design, and the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Abstract
The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP), mandated by the United States Congress in the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, attempts to protect public health from adverse endocrine effects of synthetic chemical compounds by establishing a new testing regime. But the complexities and uncertainties of endocrine disruption and its broader regulatory and social context all but ensure the failure of this policy. This article addresses the issues facing EDSP comprehensively and in detail, in order to move beyond the current regulatory paradigm and foster discourse on a positive role for scientists in support of EDSP's end goal: to protect public health.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Uncertainties for endocrine disrupters: our view on progress.Toxicol Sci. 2003 Aug;74(2):245-52. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg105. Epub 2003 May 2. Toxicol Sci. 2003. PMID: 12730617 Review.
-
Updating the Toxic Substances Control Act to Protect Human Health.JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1565-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2037. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 26974705 No abstract available.
-
Selecting appropriate animal models and experimental designs for endocrine disruptor research and testing studies.ILAR J. 2004;45(4):387-93. doi: 10.1093/ilar.45.4.387. ILAR J. 2004. PMID: 15454677 Review.
-
Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 May;30(5):898-905. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0211. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011. PMID: 21555473
-
Application of Adverse Outcome Pathways to U.S. EPA's Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 1;125(9):096001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1304. Environ Health Perspect. 2017. PMID: 28934726 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Environmental Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of French Prenatal Professionals Working with a Socially Underprivileged Population: A Qualitative Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 16;16(14):2544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142544. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31315307 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in reproductive health in Israel: implications for environmental health policy.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012 Aug 28;1(1):34. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-1-34. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012. PMID: 22929018 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of perinatal environmental health education intervention on exposure to endocrine disruptors during pregnancy-PREVED study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Dec 4;22(1):876. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05813-5. Trials. 2021. PMID: 34863252 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Our Stolen Future http://www.ourstolenfuture.org
-
- Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. Public Law 104–170, 110 Stat 1489.
-
- Federal Register. 63 FR 71542. 1998.
-
- Priority Setting Overview http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/oscpendo/prioritysetting/overview.htm
-
- Senate Committee on Labor and Resources and House Subcommittee on Health and the Environment. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993. Joint Hearings: Safety of Pesticides in Food.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources