New technology and partner notification--why aren't we using them?
- PMID: 15705267
- DOI: 10.1258/0956462052932700
New technology and partner notification--why aren't we using them?
Abstract
Partner notification is crucial to the effective control of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and has not changed substantially over recent years. New technology for communication has been rapidly adopted in our communities but little work has been carried out about its role in contact tracing. Text messaging, emails and the Internet could be useful tools for both provider and patient referral but considerable ethical considerations are involved. Technology is available to help protect the basic tenets of confidentiality and privacy but more thorough exploration of these methods is required to establish efficacy and appropriateness in contact tracing. This research is important if we are to procure an evidence base for future contact tracing strategies rather than allowing these methods to become commonplace at the initiation of our clients.
Similar articles
-
Use of new technologies to notify possible contagion of sexually-transmitted infections among men.Gac Sanit. 2015 May-Jun;29(3):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 21. Gac Sanit. 2015. PMID: 25707605
-
A survey of the use of text messaging for communication with partners in the process of provider-led partner notification.Sex Transm Infect. 2015 Mar;91(2):97-9. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051701. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Sex Transm Infect. 2015. PMID: 25352690
-
Contact tracing for STIs - new resources and supportive evidence.Aust Fam Physician. 2012 Mar;41(3):128-32. Aust Fam Physician. 2012. PMID: 22396926
-
Acceptability and efficacy of partner notification for curable sexually transmitted infections in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.Int J STD AIDS. 2019 Mar;30(3):292-303. doi: 10.1177/0956462418803983. Epub 2018 Nov 5. Int J STD AIDS. 2019. PMID: 30396318 Free PMC article.
-
Partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases.Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;44 Suppl 3:S160-74. doi: 10.1086/511429. Clin Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17342669 Review.
Cited by
-
Partner Services in Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention Programs: A Review.Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Feb;43(2 Suppl 1):S53-62. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000328. Sex Transm Dis. 2016. PMID: 26779688 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Access, use and perceptions regarding Internet, cell phones and PDAs as a means for health promotion for people living with HIV in Peru.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007 Sep 12;7:24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-24. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007. PMID: 17850656 Free PMC article.
-
Patient preferences for partner notification.Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Aug;82(4):327-9. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.018119. Sex Transm Infect. 2006. PMID: 16877586 Free PMC article.
-
Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 18;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-19. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20082718 Free PMC article.
-
Telling partners about chlamydia: how acceptable are the new technologies?BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Mar 9;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-58. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20211029 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical