A randomized prospective trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus GnRH-agonist/rFSH in women pretreated with oral contraceptives before in vitro fertilization
- PMID: 15705369
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.076
A randomized prospective trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus GnRH-agonist/rFSH in women pretreated with oral contraceptives before in vitro fertilization
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of oral contraceptive (OC) pill pretreatment in recombinant FSH/GnRH-antagonist versus recombinant FSH/GnRH-agonist stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients, and to evaluate optimization of retrieval day.
Design: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Setting: Private practice and university centers.
Patient(s): Eighty patients undergoing IVF who met the appropriate inclusion criteria.
Intervention(s): Four study centers recruited 80 patients. The OC regimen began on cycle days 2 to 4 and was discontinued on a Sunday after 14 to 28 days. The recombinant FSH regimen was begun on the following Friday. The GnRH-agonist group was treated with a long protocol; the GnRH-antagonist was initiated when the lead follicle reached 12 to 14 mm. When two follicles had reached 16 to 18 mm, hCG was administered.
Main outcome measure(s): The primary outcome measures were the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes, day of the week for oocyte retrieval, and total dose and days of stimulation of recombinant FSH. Secondary efficacy variables included pregnancy and implantation rate; serum E(2) levels on stimulation day 1; serum E(2), P, and LH levels on the day of hCG administration; follicle size on day 6 and day of hCG administration; the total days of GnRH-analogue treatment; total days on OC; total days from end of OC to oocyte retrieval; and the cycle cancellation rate.
Result(s): Patient outcomes were similar for the days of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin used, two-pronuclei embryos, pregnancy (44.4% GnRH-antagonist vs. 45.0% GnRH-agonist, P=.86) and implantation rates (22.2% GnRH-antagonist vs. 26.4% GnRH-agonist, P=.71). Oral contraceptive cycle scheduling resulted in 78% and 90% of retrievals performed Monday through Friday for GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist. A one day delay in OC discontinuation and recombinant FSH start would result in over 90% of oocyte retrievals occurring Monday through Friday in both groups.
Conclusion(s): The OC pretreatment in recombinant FSH/GnRH-antagonist protocols provides a patient-friendly regimen and can be optimized for weekday retrievals. No difference was seen in number of 2PN embryos, cryopreserved embryos, embryos transferred, implantation and pregnancy rates between the two stimulation protocols.
Similar articles
-
A randomized controlled trial of increasing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone after initiating a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.040. Epub 2006 Jun 6. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 16753156 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparative randomized trial to assess the impact of oral contraceptive pretreatment on follicular growth and hormone profiles in GnRH antagonist-treated patients.Hum Reprod. 2006 Jan;21(1):95-103. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei302. Epub 2005 Oct 27. Hum Reprod. 2006. PMID: 16253978 Clinical Trial.
-
Menstrual cycle synchronization, ovarian stimulation, and in vitro fertilization in olive baboons (Papio anubis): a prospective randomized study.Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):602-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.071. Epub 2008 Mar 6. Fertil Steril. 2009. PMID: 18328482
-
Use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists to trigger ovulation.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2002 Feb;5(1):G35-7; discussion G38-9, G41-8. doi: 10.1080/1464727992000199811. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2002. PMID: 11939159 Review.
-
[Medroxyprogesteron acetate use to block LH surge in oocyte donor stimulation].Ceska Gynekol. 2018 Winter;83(1):11-16. Ceska Gynekol. 2018. PMID: 29510633 Review. Czech.
Cited by
-
Optimal usage of the GnRH antagonists: a review of the literature.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 Mar 15;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-20. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013. PMID: 23496864 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2014 Jun 27;18(2):42-46. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20140003. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2014. PMID: 35761725 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacogenomic of LH and its receptor: are we ready for clinical practice?Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Feb 25;23(Suppl 1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01359-2. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40001128 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Live birth rate of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus luteal phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Expert Rev Mol Med. 2023 Dec 14;26:e2. doi: 10.1017/erm.2023.25. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2023. PMID: 38095077 Free PMC article.
-
The role of recombinant LH in ovarian stimulation: what's new?Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 10;23(Suppl 1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01361-8. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40059197 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous