Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Feb 7;272(1560):219-26.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2922.

Visual perception of male body attractiveness

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Visual perception of male body attractiveness

J Fan et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Based on 69 scanned Chinese male subjects and 25 Caucasian male subjects, the present study showed that the volume height index (VHI) is the most important visual cue to male body attractiveness of young Chinese viewers among the many body parameters examined in the study. VHI alone can explain ca. 73% of the variance of male body attractiveness ratings. The effect of VHI can be fitted with two half bell-shaped exponential curves with an optimal VHI at 17.6 l m(-2) and 18.0 l m(-2) for female raters and male raters, respectively. In addition to VHI, other body parameters or ratios can have small, but significant effects on male body attractiveness. Body proportions associated with fitness will enhance male body attractiveness. It was also found that there is an optimal waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) at 0.8 and deviations from this optimal WHR reduce male body attractiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) An example of a film clip in front view. (b) An example of a film clip in side view.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Plot of BMI versus male AR by female raters. (b) Plot of BMI versus male AR by male raters.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Plot of WCR versus male AR by female raters. (b) Plot of WCR versus male AR by male raters.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Plot of WHR versus male AR by female raters. (b) Plot of WHR versus male AR by male raters.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Plot of VHI versus male AR by female raters. (b) Plot of VHI versus male AR by male raters.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cronin H. The ant and the peacock. Cambridge University Press; New York: 1991.
    1. Davis K. [TC]2’s body scanner. 2001. See http://www.tc2.com/RD/RDBody.htm.
    1. Fan J.T., Liu F., Wu J., Dai W. Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2004;271:347–352. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2613 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Furnham A., Tan T., McManus C. Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: a replication and extension. Personality Individual Differences. 1997;22:539–549.
    1. Furnham A., Dias M., McClelland A. The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles. 1998;39:311–326.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources