Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation
- PMID: 15707565
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.013
Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess women's preferences and acceptability of medical (MA) and surgical abortion (SA) at 10-13 weeks gestation. This was a partially randomized patient preference trial. Women were offered to enter the randomized arm of the trial. Those who expressed a strong preference for a method were entered into the preference arm. A total of 368 women were randomized (188 medical and 180 surgical) while 77 entered the preference arm (15 medical and 62 surgical). Prior to abortion, 253 women (72%) indicated a preference for MA while 98 (28%) showed a preference for surgery (p < .0001). Despite having a preference for a particular method, women were content with alternatives. Women were more likely to choose the same abortion method again if they had shown a preference for that method prior to abortion (p = .002 and .01 for MA and SA, respectively). The availability of MA is an important option for many women who wish to avoid surgery or anesthesia and should now be offered routinely in the late first trimester.
Similar articles
-
Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).Health Technol Assess. 2009 Nov;13(53):1-124, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13530. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19906334 Clinical Trial.
-
Psychological sequelae of medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Aug;84(8):761-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00728.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005. PMID: 16026402 Clinical Trial.
-
Acceptability of medical abortion in early pregnancy.Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Jul-Aug;27(4):142-8, 185. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995. PMID: 7589354 Review.
-
Choice of and satisfaction with methods of medical and surgical abortion among U.S. clinic patients.Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Sep-Oct;33(5):212-6. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001. PMID: 11589542
-
Women's perceptions on medical abortion.Contraception. 2006 Jul;74(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.02.012. Epub 2006 May 6. Contraception. 2006. PMID: 16781253 Review.
Cited by
-
Partially randomised patient preference trials as an alternative design to randomised controlled trials: systematic review and meta-analyses.BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 16;9(10):e031151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031151. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31619428 Free PMC article.
-
Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis.JAMA Surg. 2022 Jul 1;157(7):598-608. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1554. JAMA Surg. 2022. PMID: 35612859 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
It's a small bit of advice, but actually on the day, made such a difference…: perceptions of quality in abortion care in England and Wales.Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 7;18(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01270-0. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 34743705 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences of abortion: a narrative review of qualitative studies.BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jul 17;8:150. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-150. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 18637178 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Retrospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mifepristone-Misoprostol Medical Abortions in the First Year at the Regina General Hospital.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Feb;43(2):211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 25. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021. PMID: 33153943 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical