Adaptation to spiral motion: global but not local motion detectors are modulated by attention
- PMID: 15707918
- DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.012
Adaptation to spiral motion: global but not local motion detectors are modulated by attention
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the effect of attention on local motion detectors. For this purpose we used logarithmic spirals previously used by Cavanagh and Favreau [Perception, 1980, 9(2), 175-182]. While the adapting stimulus was a rotating logarithmic spiral, the test stimulus was either the same spiral or its mirror image. When superimposed, all contours of the spiral stimulus and its mirror image are 90 degrees apart. Presenting the same spiral during the test period shows adaptation of both local motion detectors and global rotation detectors, whereas showing the mirror-spiral stimulates another set of local motion detectors, and therefore illustrates adaptation at only the global motion level. To manipulate the attentional state of observers, a secondary task was presented during the adaptation phase and observers either performed the task or ignored it. Motion aftereffect (MAE) duration was measured afterwards. While the effects of attention and test stimulus type on MAE duration were both significant, the difference in the MAE strength between the attention-distracted and attention-not-distracted conditions was equal when the test stimulus was the same-spiral or the mirror-spiral, suggesting that attention to spiral motion modulates only global rotation units and does not affect local motion detectors located at V1. Our results are in accord with those reported by Watanabe et al. [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1998, 95(19), 11489-11492] which showed differential modulation of motion processing areas depending on the type of motion being attended. Therefore our data are supportive of the notion that attentional modulation of V1 is highly task-dependent.
Similar articles
-
Adaptation to spiral motion in crowding condition.Perception. 2005;34(2):155-62. doi: 10.1068/p5298. Perception. 2005. PMID: 15832566
-
Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments.Vision Res. 2004 Dec;44(26):3035-44. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.020. Vision Res. 2004. PMID: 15474576
-
Attention modulates perception of transparent motion.Vision Res. 2005 Sep;45(19):2587-99. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.03.004. Epub 2005 Apr 20. Vision Res. 2005. PMID: 16022880
-
Motion adaptation and attention: A critical review and meta-analysis.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jan;96:290-301. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019. PMID: 30355521
-
Some stimulus dimensions of rotating spirals.Psychol Rev. 1965 Sep;72(5):344-57. doi: 10.1037/h0022204. Psychol Rev. 1965. PMID: 5318086 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Effects of crowding and attention on high-levels of motion processing and motion adaptation.PLoS One. 2015 Jan 23;10(1):e0117233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117233. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25615577 Free PMC article.
-
Second-order motion without awareness: passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect.Vision Res. 2007 Feb;47(4):569-79. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.016. Epub 2007 Jan 10. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17217978 Free PMC article.
-
Position shifts following crowded second-order motion adaptation reveal processing of local and global motion without awareness.J Vis. 2007 Jul 20;7(2):15.1-13. doi: 10.1167/7.2.15. J Vis. 2007. PMID: 18217830 Free PMC article.
-
Sustained invisibility through crowding and continuous flash suppression: a comparative review.Front Psychol. 2014 May 27;5:475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00475. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24904489 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared attentional resources for global and local motion processing.J Vis. 2007 Jul 24;7(10):10.1-10. doi: 10.1167/7.10.10. J Vis. 2007. PMID: 17997679 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials