Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems
- PMID: 15708213
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.052
Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems
Abstract
In accounting for the well-established sex differences on mental rotation tasks that involve cube stimuli of the Shepard and Metzler (Shepard & Metzler, 1971) kind, performance factors are frequently invoked. Three studies are presented that examine performance factors. In Study 1, analyses of the performance of a large number of subjects (n=1765) that performed the Vandenberg and Kuse (1976) mental rotation test (MRT) under standard conditions showed that the magnitude of the sex differences increases as subjects proceed through the sequence of problems, and that fewer females than males reach the last problems in a problem set. This supports the role of time constraints in sex differences on the MRT. Study 2 compared the magnitude of sex differences for subjects (n=212) who did the MRT under standard conditions (T1), and with double the time (T2) allowed for the test. No significant reduction in the magnitude of sex differences was observed-even though the overall scores under T2 increased markedly for both sexes. Study 3 examined the suggestion by that mental rotation differences arise because females spend more time than males in assuring that stimuli that do not match do indeed not match, with no sex differences for matching stimuli. This hypothesis was not supported for a sample of 20 males and 26 females. We conclude that performance factors may play a role in sex difference on mental rotation tasks, but do not account for all of the differences.
Similar articles
-
Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library.Brain Cogn. 2008 Apr;66(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Oct 29. Brain Cogn. 2008. PMID: 17967499 Review.
-
Sex differences in mental rotations: an effect of time limits?Brain Cogn. 1993 Jan;21(1):71-9. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1993.1005. Brain Cogn. 1993. PMID: 8424863
-
Subgroup analysis of sex difference on the Vandenberg-Kuse mental rotation test.Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Feb;96(1):197-200. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.197. Percept Mot Skills. 2003. PMID: 12705526
-
Does egocentric mental rotation elicit sex differences?Neuroimage. 2004 Dec;23(4):1440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.010. Neuroimage. 2004. PMID: 15589108
-
Mental rotation: an examination of assumptions.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;8(6). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1443. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017. PMID: 28387440 Review.
Cited by
-
Framing the figure: Mental rotation revisited in light of cognitive strategies.Mem Cognit. 2017 Jan;45(1):63-80. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0648-1. Mem Cognit. 2017. PMID: 27600699
-
Visual-Spatial Perspective-Taking in Spatial Scenes and in American Sign Language.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Sep 10;25(4):447-456. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enaa006. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020. PMID: 32476020 Free PMC article.
-
Bilateral parietal activations for complex visual-spatial functions: Evidence from a visual-spatial construction task.Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 4. Neuropsychologia. 2017. PMID: 28987904 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating sex differences, cognitive effort, strategy, and performance on a computerised version of the mental rotations test via eye tracking.Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):19430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56041-6. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31857671 Free PMC article.
-
Social Abilities and Visual-Spatial Perspective-Taking Skill: Deaf Signers and Hearing Nonsigners.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2019 Jul 1;24(3):201-213. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz006. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2019. PMID: 30882873 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources