Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Mar 1;61(3):870-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.697.

Accuracy of survival prediction by palliative radiation oncologists

Affiliations

Accuracy of survival prediction by palliative radiation oncologists

Edward Chow et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the accuracy of survival prediction by palliative radiation oncologists.

Methods and materials: After consultation of cancer patients with metastatic disease for referral of palliative radiotherapy, radiation oncologists estimated the survival of the patients. These were compared with the actual dates of death obtained from the Cancer Death Registry. The time to death from all causes was the outcome. The survival times were measured from the date of the first consultation at the palliative radiotherapy clinics.

Results: Six radiation oncologists provided estimates for 739 patients. Of the 739 patients, 396 were men and 343 were women (median age, 69 years). The median survival of all patients was 15.9 weeks. The mean difference between the actual survival (AS) and the clinician predicted survival (i.e., actual survival minus clinician predicted survival) was -12.3 weeks (95% confidence interval, -15.0 to -9.5) for the entire population. The mean difference was -21.9 weeks when the actual survival was < or =12 weeks, -19.2 weeks when the AS was 13-26 weeks, -9.7 weeks when the AS was 27-52 weeks, and +23.0 weeks when the AS was >52 weeks.

Conclusion: In this study, the prediction of survival by radiation oncologists was inaccurate and tended to be overly optimistic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources