Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Sep;64(9):1274-9.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.031476. Epub 2005 Feb 11.

Treatment continuation in patients receiving biological agents or conventional DMARD therapy

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Treatment continuation in patients receiving biological agents or conventional DMARD therapy

A Zink et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To compare drug continuation rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who start on a biological agent and in a control group of patients with a change in disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment after previous DMARD failure.

Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included in the study. Data were available for 511 patients treated with etanercept, 343 with infliximab, 70 with anakinra, and 599 controls. Propensity scores were used to select a subsample of patients from the control group who were likely to be treated with biological agents because of their disease severity, as well as comparable infliximab and etanercept cases.

Results: Treatment continuation after 12 months was similar for etanercept (68.6% (95% confidence interval, 62% to 75%)) and infliximab (65.4% (58% to 73%)) but lower for anakinra (59% (41% to 77%)). Treatment continuation was more likely for patients on combinations of biological agents and DMARDs than for those on infliximab or etanercept alone. Patients treated with biological agents were more severely ill than those in the control group and had more previous DMARD failures. After adjustment for baseline differences, the continuation rates were higher in patients treated with biological agents than in comparable control patients treated with leflunomide or leflunomide/methotrexate.

Conclusions: Treatment continuation of biological agents in clinical practice is less likely than in randomised clinical trials but more likely than in comparable controls treated with conventional DMARDs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Probability of treatment continuation in patients receiving biological agents.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Probability of treatment continuation in patients with an increased likelihood of being treated with tumour necrosis factor (propensity score >50%).

References

    1. Lancet. 1999 Dec 4;354(9194):1932-9 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30;343(22):1594-602 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Mar;46(3):614-24 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jun;46(6):1443-50 - PubMed
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Sep;61(9):793-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms