Transthoracic needle biopsy of lung masses: a survey of techniques

Abstract

Aim: In order to assess the range and everyday use of the various techniques for percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung masses in the USA and Canada, we surveyed thoracic radiologists in academic and community practice on their standard approach to the procedure.

Materials and methods: The 300 questionnaires that were mailed to members of the Society of Thoracic Radiology throughout the USA and Canada contained specific questions on their approach to a transthoracic needle biopsy of a routine case of a 3cm lung mass located in the right lower lobe 1cm from the pleural surface.

Results: A total of 140 (47%) members responded. Of the 139 responders who performed lung biopsies, 103 (74%) were located at a teaching centre affiliated to a university or medical school, and 36 (26%) were community-based radiologists. In total 97 (70%) replied that they would perform the procedure under CT guidance, 31 (22%) under either CT or fluoroscopy guidance, and 11 (8%) only under fluoroscopy. Fine-needle aspiration was the procedure of choice for the given case by 101 (73%) responders, whereas 20 (14%) preferred doing core biopsy, and 18 (13%) chose both techniques. On-site cytology confirmation for obtaining diagnostic material was available to 101 (73%) responders. Before performing the procedure, 107 (77%) verified coagulation tests whereas 32 (23%) did not. Follow-up imaging for pneumothorax assessment was not routinely performed by 15 (11%) responders.

Conclusion: The majority of radiologists performed percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of a lung mass under CT guidance, by fine-needle aspiration, using repeated pleural puncture technique, and with a cytologist on site. A significant minority did not obtain coagulation screening before the procedure, and a small minority did not routinely assess for pneumothorax by late chest radiography.