Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Mar;6(2):172-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00866304.

The evaluation of paediatric renal transplants using resistive index and renal blood flow

Affiliations

The evaluation of paediatric renal transplants using resistive index and renal blood flow

M M Fitzpatrick et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 1992 Mar.

Abstract

Six children (aged 1.3-6.9 years) were examined with serial duplex Doppler sonography and diethylenetriaminepenta-acetic acid (DTPA) isotope renography in the post-renal transplant period. The resistive index (RI) was derived from sonographic studies and the renal blood flow (RBF) calculated from the isotope scans. The clinical status of the child and the corresponding plasma creatinine level were assessed together with these two parameters. The RIs ranged from 40% to 100% and the RBF from 0% to 16.8%. There were six rejection episodes in four patients. A significant fall in RBF mirrored a rise in plasma creatinine on each occasion, but there was no significant change in RI recorded. There were two graft losses, both associated with renal venous thrombosis. In both cases no significant RBF could be detected on DTPA renography. In one patient, the RBF remained low throughout a period of primary non-function associated with acute tubular necrosis, and increased as primary function was established and the plasma creatinine fell. Throughout this period there was no significant change in the RI. From our preliminary data RBF reflects graft dysfunction more accurately than does the RI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Radiol. 1986 Mar;59(699):209-15 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Apr;148(4):759-62 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1988 Nov;169(2):371-6 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1987 Jan;162(1 Pt 1):39-42 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1989 Sep;172(3 Pt 2):1027-30 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources