Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Dec;2(6):321-6.
doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(04)80030-1.

Hospital accreditation and the surgeon: the Canadian experience

Affiliations
Review

Hospital accreditation and the surgeon: the Canadian experience

J A Robblee et al. Surgeon. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

Accreditation is an internationally recognised process through which healthcare organisations are able to improve the safety and quality of services delivered to patients. The focus of accreditation is to help organisations understand what they are doing well and what opportunities are available for improvement. The Canadian approach to accreditation is a rigorous peer review process comprised of a self-assessment against a set of standards, an on-site survey and follow-up action on recommendations that arise from the survey. The accreditation standards can be used effectively to guide the surgical teams in the transformation of the specialty. The 17 standards that are used to evaluate surgical teams relate to the activities that represent the continuum of clinical care as well as aspects related to learning. Within the subsections and standards are opportunities for surgeons and surgical teams to use the standards to effectively deliver services and to continuously improve patient care. In 38 recent Canadian Accreditation AIM surveys, that included at least one surgical team, there were a total of 75 recommendations made to the teams. Most recommendations related to process as opposed to outcome issues, implying that surgeons need to become more proactive in the functioning of the surgical team and to participate more effectively in management issues related to surgical care. Attention to these details will position surgical programmes to effectively deal with the rapid pace of change that is inherent in a modern surgical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation . 2002 National Health Accreditation Report. CCHSA; Ottawa: 2003.
    1. Scrivens E. Accreditation and the Regulation of Quality. In: Saltman RB, Busse R, Mossialos E, editors. Regulating Entrepreneurial Behaviour in European Healthcare Systems. Open University Press; Buckingham: 2002. pp. 91–105.
    1. Canadian Council on Health Services Accreditation. Second Edition. AIM: Achieving Improved Measurement Accreditation Programme; 2004.
    1. Brauer CM. Champions of Quality in Healthcare. Greenwich Publishing Group; Lyme, Connecticut: 2001. From Standardisation to the Creation of the joint Commission: 1910–1954; pp. 12–35.
    1. Ernst MF, Voogd AC, Coebergh JW, Roukema JA. Breast carcinoma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis before and after the introduction of mass mammographic screening. Cancer. 2004;100(7):1337–1344. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources