Critical appraisal of neuroprotection trials in head injury: what have we learned?
- PMID: 15717008
- PMCID: PMC534913
- DOI: 10.1602/neurorx.1.1.71
Critical appraisal of neuroprotection trials in head injury: what have we learned?
Abstract
To date, despite very encouraging preclinical results, almost all phase II/III clinical neuroprotection trials in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have failed to show any consistent improvement in outcome for TBI patients. To understand the reasons behind such developments we need to review and evaluate the evolution of trial design as a result of our changing understanding of the pathophysiology of brain cell death and progress of translational research from the laboratory bench to the bedside. This paper attempts to critically appraise these neuroprotection trials, rationalize the paucity of effectiveness, review any recent developments in the field, and try to draw some conclusions on how to move forward.
References
-
- Kay A, Teasdale GM. Head injury in the United Kingdom. World J Surg 25: 1210–1220, 2001. - PubMed
-
- Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability and the contribution of the risk factors: global burden of disease study. Lancet 349: 1436–1442, 1997. - PubMed
-
- Bullock R, Lyeth BG, Muizelaar JP. Current status of neuroprotection trials for traumatic brain injury: lessons from animal models and clinical studies. Neurosurgery 45: 207–220, 1999. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
