Using a medium-fill simulation to evaluate the microbial contamination rate for USP medium-risk-level compounding
- PMID: 15719586
- DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/62.3.285
Using a medium-fill simulation to evaluate the microbial contamination rate for USP medium-risk-level compounding
Abstract
Purpose: The estimated microbial contamination rate for complex, multiple-step, medium-risk-level compounding was studied.
Methods: The results of evaluations of the aseptic technique of pharmacists and technicians in compounding complex USP medium-risk-level sterile preparations were compiled to estimate the microbial contamination rate. The testing took place in 2002 and 2003 at a single institution and involved reconstitution of sterile dry growth medium and a series of complicated transfers of the medium from vials and ampuls to intravenous bags. The bags were incubated at 25-35 degrees C for 14 days and observed for microbial growth.
Results: Of 539 evaluations, 28 (5.2%) resulted in preparations that yielded microbial growth. Pharmacists' compounding resulted in a slightly lower contamination rate (4.4%) than that of technicians (6.2%). Inadvertent touch contamination may have been the principal source of the contamination.
Conclusion: . A two-year series of 539 evaluations of the aseptic technique of pharmacists and technicians conducted with sterile growth medium and designed to simulate the compounding of USP medium-risk-level sterile preparations yielded an overall contamination rate of 5.2%.
Similar articles
-
Effect of two work practice changes on the microbial contamination rates of pharmacy-compounded sterile preparations.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Apr 15;64(8):837-41. doi: 10.2146/060199. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007. PMID: 17420200
-
Using medium-fill simulation to establish a benchmark microbiological contamination rate for low-risk-level compounding.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Sep 15;60(18):1853-5. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.18.1853. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003. PMID: 14521036
-
Aseptic simulation test challenged with microorganisms for validation of pharmacy operators.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Jul 15;69(14):1218-24. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110295. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012. PMID: 22761076
-
Basics of Sterile Compounding: Personnel Requirements for Sterile Compounding.Int J Pharm Compd. 2016 Jul-Aug;20(4):307-314. Int J Pharm Compd. 2016. PMID: 28333676 Review.
-
Choosing a Vial Processing Line for Aseptic Compounding: Part 1.Int J Pharm Compd. 2016 Jul-Aug;20(4):283-292. Int J Pharm Compd. 2016. PMID: 28333673 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of Piggyback Electrolytes for Patients Receiving Individually Prescribed vs Premixed Parenteral Nutrition.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 Jul;39(5):586-90. doi: 10.1177/0148607113518583. Epub 2014 Jan 3. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015. PMID: 24390715 Free PMC article.
-
Parenterals laboratory course to reduce microbial contamination rates in media fill tests performed by pharmacy students.Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Apr 15;72(2):27. doi: 10.5688/aj720227. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008. PMID: 18483595 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Sensitivity of a Media-Fill Challenge Test Under Various Situations as a Reliable Method for Recommended Aseptic Technique Competency Assessment.J Pharm Technol. 2016 Apr;32(2):47-53. doi: 10.1177/8755122515607537. Epub 2015 Oct 5. J Pharm Technol. 2016. PMID: 34861002 Free PMC article.
-
Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Sep 1;9(5):281-92. doi: 10.2165/11594980-000000000-00000. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011. PMID: 21761945 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Aseptic Compounding Errors Before and After Modified Laboratory and Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experiences.Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Dec 25;79(10):158. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7910158. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015. PMID: 26889070 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources