The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions
- PMID: 15722071
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.09.004
The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions
Abstract
Although access to and knowledge of emergency contraception (EC) have improved, numerous unplanned pregnancies occur each year. We thus assessed the remaining barriers to EC use in a population of women seeking an abortion in four abortion centers in France in 2002. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 1365 women. Most women have heard of EC (89%), but access to information remained limited in socially disadvantaged populations. Nevertheless, the unperceived risk of pregnancy appeared to be the most limiting factor to EC use. Only 38.5% of women were aware of pregnancy risk at the time of the intercourse that made them pregnant. Of these women, 48% minimized the risk later, resulting in the decision not to use EC. As the perception of risk is commonly reevaluated by women over time, which probably affects EC use, it could be important to promote advance supply of EC so that women could use it immediately after a recognized unprotected intercourse.
Similar articles
-
Emergency contraception: change in knowledge of women attending for termination of pregnancy from 1984 to 1996.Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jan;24(4):121-2. Br J Fam Plann. 1999. PMID: 10023095
-
Who is using emergency contraception? Awareness and use of emergency contraception among California women and teens.Womens Health Issues. 2008 Sep-Oct;18(5):360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.06.005. Womens Health Issues. 2008. PMID: 18774454
-
Emergency contraception: knowledge and perceptions in a university population.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006 Apr;18(4):161-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00114.x. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006. PMID: 16573729
-
Emergency contraception in Wisconsin: a review.WMJ. 2006 Jul;105(5):40-4. WMJ. 2006. PMID: 16933412 Review.
-
Hormonal emergency contraception: a clinical primer.S D Med. 2007 Mar;60(3):99-101, 103-5. S D Med. 2007. PMID: 17455578 Review.
Cited by
-
Emergency contraception: dispelling the myths and misperceptions.Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Apr;88(4):243-4. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.077446. Bull World Health Organ. 2010. PMID: 20431781 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
CUBES: A practical toolkit to measure enablers and barriers to behavior for effective intervention design.Gates Open Res. 2019 Mar 18;3:886. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12923.2. eCollection 2019. Gates Open Res. 2019. PMID: 31294419 Free PMC article.
-
Use of non-emergency contraceptive pills and concoctions as emergency contraception among Nigerian University students: results of a qualitative study.BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 4;16(1):1046. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3707-4. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27716213 Free PMC article.
-
Australian women's fertility experiences prior to a termination of pregnancy.ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 20;2014:794380. doi: 10.1155/2014/794380. eCollection 2014. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014. PMID: 24707216 Free PMC article.
-
Women and postfertilization effects of birth control: consistency of beliefs, intentions and reported use.BMC Womens Health. 2005 Nov 28;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-5-11. BMC Womens Health. 2005. PMID: 16313677 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials