Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Apr 16;330(7496):874.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38369.459988.8F. Epub 2005 Feb 18.

Quetiapine and rivastigmine and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Quetiapine and rivastigmine and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial

Clive Ballard et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the respective efficacy of quetiapine and rivastigmine for agitation in people with dementia in institutional care and to evaluate these treatments with respect to change in cognitive performance.

Design: Randomised double blind (clinician, patient, outcomes assessor) placebo controlled trial.

Setting: Care facilities in the north east of England.

Participants: 93 patients with Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and clinically significant agitation.

Intervention: Atypical antipsychotic (quetiapine), cholinesterase inhibitor (rivastigmine), or placebo (double dummy).

Main outcome measures: Agitation (Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory) and cognition (severe impairment battery) at baseline and at six weeks and 26 weeks. The primary outcome was agitation inventory at six weeks.

Results: 31 patients were randomised to each group, and 80 (86%) started treatment (25 rivastigmine, 26 quetiapine, 29 placebo), of whom 71 (89%) tolerated the maximum protocol dose (22 rivastigmine, 23 quetiapine, 26 placebo). Compared with placebo, neither group showed significant differences in improvement on the agitation inventory either at six weeks or 26 weeks. Fifty six patients scored > 10 on the severe impairment battery at baseline, 46 (82%) of whom were included in the analysis at six week follow up (14 rivastigmine, 14 quetiapine, 18 placebo). For quetiapine the change in severe impairment battery score from baseline was estimated as an average of -14.6 points (95% confidence interval -25.3 to -4.0) lower (that is, worse) than in the placebo group at six weeks (P = 0.009) and -15.4 points (-27.0 to -3.8) lower at 26 weeks (P = 0.01). The corresponding changes with rivastigmine were -3.5 points (-13.1 to 6.2) lower at six weeks (P = 0.5) and -7.5 points (-21.0 to 6.0) lower at 26 weeks (P = 0.3).

Conclusions: Neither quetiapine nor rivastigmine are effective in the treatment of agitation in people with dementia in institutional care. Compared with placebo, quetiapine is associated with significantly greater cognitive decline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of participants through trial
Fig 2
Fig 2
Change in score on Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory (baseline to six weeks) by treatment group
Fig 3
Fig 3
Change in score on severe impairment battery (baseline to six weeks) by treatment group

Comment in

References

    1. Ballard C, Holmes C, McKeith I, Neill D, Lantos P, Cairns N, et al. Psychiatric morbidity in dementia with Lewy bodies: a prospective clinical and neuropathological comparative study with Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156: 1039-45. - PubMed
    1. McGrath AM, Jackson GA. Survey of prescribing in residents of nursing homes in Glasgow. BMJ 1996;314: 611-2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballard C, O'Brien J. Treating behavioural and psychological signs in Alzheimer's disease. BMJ 1999;319: 138-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Committee on Safety of Medicines. Atypical antipsychotic drugs and stroke. www.mca.gov.uk (accessed 9 March 2004).
    1. Tariot P. Atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of BPSD. Int Psychogeriatr (in press).

MeSH terms