Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Feb;14(1):27-35.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0759-4. Epub 2004 Jun 26.

Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration

Lorin M Benneker et al. Eur Spine J. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common finding in MRI scans and X-rays. However, their correlation to morphological and biochemical changes is not well established. In this study, radiological and MRI parameters of DDD were assessed and compared with morphological and biochemical findings of disc degeneration. Thirty-nine human lumbar discs (L1-S1), age 19-86 years, were harvested from eight cadavers. Within 48 h postmortem, MRIs in various spin-echo sequences and biplanar radiographs of intact spines were obtained. Individual discs with endplates were then sectioned in the mid-sagittal plane and graded according to the morphological appearance. Samples from the nucleus of each disc were harvested for biochemical analysis including water and proteoglycan contents. On MRIs, T2-signal intensity, Modic changes, disc extension beyond the interspace (DEBIT), nucleus pulposus shape, annular tears, osteophytes and endplate integrity were graded. On radiographs, an independent observer classified the parameters disc height, endplate sclerosis, osteophytes, Schmorl's nodes, intradiscal calcifications and endplate shape. General linear-regression models were used for statistical analysis. Backward elimination with a 10% significance cut-off level was used to identify the most significant parameters, which then were summed to create composite scores for radiography, MRI and the combination of both methods. The grading was performed by three observers, and a reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha model was used to control interobserver agreement. The three radiographic parameters height-loss, osteophytes and intradiscal calcifications correlated significantly with the morphological degree of degeneration (p<0.001, R2=642). Significant differences of even one morphological grade could also be differentiated in the composite radiological score (p<0.05), except at the extremes between grades 1 and 2 and grades 4 and 5. All MRI parameters correlated significantly with the morphological grade (p<0.05); however Modic changes, T2-intensity and osteophytes accounted for 83% of the variation in the data. T2-signal intensity correlated significantly with H2O and proteoglycan content (p<0.001), and was best for detecting highly degenerated discs. Regression showed that the combined score was better correlated with the morphological grade (p<0.001, R2=775) than either the composite radiographic (p<0.001, R2=642) or composite MRI (p<0.001, R2=696) alone. Based on the combined score, a backwards elimination of the regression was performed, in which the parameters Modic changes, and T2-intensity loss (MRI) as well as calcifications (X-ray) accounted for 87% of the variability. The interobserver validation showed a high correlation for all three scores (Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.95 to 0.97).

Conclusion: Selective imaging parameters and a newly created scoring scheme were found to correlate with disc degeneration as determined in a morphological manner. Surprisingly, radiographic parameters were able to distinguish different stages of degeneration, whereas MRI could only detect advanced stages of disc degeneration. We conclude that X-rays may remain a cost-effective, non-invasive in vivo-grading method to detect early disc degeneration, and, combined with MRI, correlate best with morphological and biochemical assessment of disc degeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1 a
Fig. 1 a
Grade 1: segment L4–L5 of a 19-year-old female. The nucleus is gelatinous and round, or oval-shaped, on MR with a high T2-signal intensity. The annulus show discrete fibrous lamellas. The endplate is intact, with a uniformly thick hyaline cartilage layer. The vertebral body still has rounded margins, with no Schmorl’s nodes or sclerosis; b grade 2: segment L2–L3 of a 53-year-old female. In the nucleus, peripherally, white fibrous tissue becomes visible. The annulus presents mucinous material between lamellas. The cartilage layer of the endplate becomes irregular; c grade 3: segment L3–L4 of a 53-year-old female. Consolidated fibrous tissue in the nucleus area and loss of the annular nuclear demarcation. On radiographs, reduction of the disc height and early osteophytes formation is visible. Frequently, rim calcification and sclerosis are also visible. On MRI, T2-signal intensity is reduced; the nucleus flattens and can extend into the inner annulus; isolated defects of the endplate and concentric tears of the annulus appear; d grade 4: segment L3–L4 of an 86-year-old female. Horizontal clefts parallel to the endplate are visible macroscopically and on MRI. Osteophytes, small Schmorl’s nodes and intranuclear calcification are common findings. The nucleus can extend into the outer annulus; e grade 5: segment L4–L5 of a 64-year-old male. Disc height is markedly reduced. The nucleus has disappeared totally (absent T2 signal), and big, sometimes-bridging, osteophytes appear. Diffuse and severe sclerosis and calcifications dominate
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Composite radiographic score (CRS) vs morphological degeneration. Data points represent the mean of the sum of parameters: disc height loss, osteophytes and intradiscal calcifications, with error bars representing one standard error of the mean
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Composite MRI score (CMS) vs morphological degeneration. Data points represent the mean of the sum of parameters: Modic changes, osteophytes, nucleus shape and T2-intensity loss, with error bars representing one standard error of the mean
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean proteoglycan content vs the nucleus pulposus to T2-signal intensity loss, with error bars representing one standard error of the mean
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Composite imaging score (CIS) vs morphological degeneration. Data points represent the mean of the sum of parameters: disc height loss (X-ray), osteophytes (X-ray), calcifications (X-ray), T2-intensity loss (MRI), Modic changes (MRI) and nucleus shape (MRI), with error bars representing one standard error of the mean

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersson GB (1998) Epidemiology of low back pain. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 281:28–31 - PubMed
    1. Antoniou J Clin Invest. 1996;98:996. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antoniou Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:900. - PubMed
    1. Benneker Vertebral endplate marrow contact channel. 2002;occlusions:a. - PubMed
    1. Boden J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:403. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms