Fertility outcome after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy evaluated in a randomized trial
- PMID: 1572493
- DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55015-8
Fertility outcome after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy evaluated in a randomized trial
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the fertility outcome after laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy.
Design: A randomized trial versus laparotomy was performed between May 1987 and June 1989.
Setting: The study was conducted in a clinical university center, the Sahlgrens Hospital.
Patients: A group of 105 patients with tubal pregnancy were stratified with regard to risk determinants and age and randomized to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Eighty-seven patients who desired pregnancy were evaluated for subsequent fertility outcome.
Interventions: Linear salpingotomy was performed in both surgical groups.
Main outcome measure: We evaluated the fertility outcome after laparoscopic salpingotomy for comparison with the outcome after laparotomy.
Results: There was no difference between the groups in the overall fertility outcome. A substantially higher proportion of patients in the laparotomy group were subjected to adhesiolysis performed at a second-look laparoscopy.
Conclusions: The fertility prospects are not impaired by laparoscopic surgery. Adhesiolysis at a second-look laparoscopy, especially after laparotomy, might be beneficial in selected cases and may serve to improve subsequent fertility.
Similar articles
-
[Fertility after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy, evaluated by a randomized trial].Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 Oct 11;155(41):3282-6. Ugeskr Laeger. 1993. PMID: 8256322 Clinical Trial. Danish.
-
Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy.Fertil Steril. 1991 May;55(5):911-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54298-8. Fertil Steril. 1991. PMID: 1827075 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of second-look laparoscopy on subsequent fertility outcome after laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy: a randomized controlled study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 May-Jun;22(4):612-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Jan 22. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25620217 Clinical Trial.
-
[Ectopic pregnancy. Techniques and results of celioscopic treatment].Rev Prat. 1991 Dec 1;41(25):2547-51. Rev Prat. 1991. PMID: 1839454 Review. French.
-
Endoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy.Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Dec;8(4):707-22. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80051-3. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1994. PMID: 7882621 Review.
Cited by
-
Tubal ectopic pregnancy.BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Apr 20;2009:1406. BMJ Clin Evid. 2009. PMID: 19445747 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Mar 25;11(3):e0152343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152343. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27015601 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):14-29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0564-0. Epub 2005 Oct 24. Surg Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16247571 Review.
-
The effects of conservative and surgical approaches in tubal ectopic pregnancy on fertility.Ann Saudi Med. 2024 May-Jun;44(3):141-145. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.141. Epub 2024 Jun 6. Ann Saudi Med. 2024. PMID: 38853473 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD000324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000324.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17253448 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical