The importance of chemotherapy dose intensity in lung cancer
- PMID: 15726536
- DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.11.025
The importance of chemotherapy dose intensity in lung cancer
Abstract
The evidence for the importance of maintaining full dose on schedule chemotherapy for lung cancer varies considerably by histologic type. Several studies have evaluated chemotherapy dose and dose intensity in small cell lung cancer; fewer studies have evaluated the importance of chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. The current guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend adjuvant chemotherapy in most patients with resectable disease, and there is increasing evidence that chemotherapy benefits elderly patients as much as younger patients. Clinical trials in the setting of palliative treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer have focused on testing new regimens rather than evaluating the impact of maintaining the dose and schedule of standard chemotherapy regimens. However, in light of the potential curative role of chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting, the optimal doses and schedules of these regimens may have an important impact on outcomes. In addition, data suggest that responses in the neoadjuvant setting correlate with survival, and this may also be an appropriate setting in which to test the effect of the chemotherapy dose and schedule. Survival is the primary measure of treatment efficacy, but other end points, such as quality of life and disease stability, should also be considered in advanced disease. Because new regimens will shape the choice of treatment in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, it is important to determine the significance of maintaining full dose on schedule with conventional chemotherapy regimens to ensure optimal outcomes in the treatment of lung cancer.
Similar articles
-
Perspectives in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Semin Oncol. 2004 Dec;31(6 Suppl 15):14-8. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.11.023. Semin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15726534 Review.
-
Therapeutic options for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Jun;35(4):340-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.10.008. Epub 2009 Jan 19. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009. PMID: 19155139 Review.
-
Dose and schedule as determinants of outcomes in chemotherapy for breast cancer.Semin Oncol. 2004 Dec;31(6 Suppl 15):3-9. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.11.021. Semin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15726532 Review.
-
[Treatment of the unresectable non small cell lung carcinoma].Cas Lek Cesk. 2005;144(9):602-12; discussion 612-3. Cas Lek Cesk. 2005. PMID: 16193938 Review. Czech.
-
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Mar;13(3):291-301. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.01.015. Epub 2006 Feb 1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16450219 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and efficacy of amrubicin with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim as second-line chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer.Thorac Cancer. 2023 Dec;14(35):3475-3482. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15140. Epub 2023 Oct 24. Thorac Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37873674 Free PMC article.
-
Quality-of-life outcomes for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized trial, JBR.10.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 1;26(31):5052-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6094. Epub 2008 Sep 22. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18809617 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical