Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Mar;100(3):748-753.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000144774.42408.05.

Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs

Affiliations

Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs

Lester A Critchley et al. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar.

Abstract

We have used an animal model to test the reliability of a new portable continuous-wave Doppler ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM. In six anesthetized dogs, cardiac output was measured with a high-precision transit time ultrasonic flowprobe placed on the ascending aorta. The dogs' cardiac output was increased with a dopamine infusion (0-15 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Simultaneous flowprobe and USCOM cardiac output measurements were made. Up to 64 pairs of readings were collected from each dog. Data were compared by using the Bland and Altman plot method and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. A total of 319 sets of paired readings were collected. The mean (+/-sd) cardiac output was 2.62 +/- 1.04 L/min, and readings ranged from 0.79 to 5.73 L/min. The mean bias between the 2 sets of readings was -0.0l L/min, with limits of agreement (95% confidence intervals) of -0.34 to 0.31 L/min. This represents a +/-13% error. In five of six dogs, there was a high degree of concordance, or agreement, between the 2 methods, with coefficients >0.9. The USCOM provided reliable measurements of cardiac output over a wide range of values. Clinical trials are needed to validate the device in humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 1996;276:889–97.
    1. Van De Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, et al. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Chest 2003;123:2028–33.
    1. Clarke DE, Raffin TA. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output: not ready for prime time. Crit Care Med 1993;21:1111–2.
    1. Weil MH. Electrical bioimpedance for noninvasive measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care Med 1997;25:1455.
    1. Perrino AC Jr, Fleming J, LaMantia KR. Transesophageal Doppler ultrasonography: evidence for improved cardiac output monitoring. Anesth Analg 1990;71:651–7.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources