Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Apr;30(4):878-81.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.878-881.1992.

Comparison of MB-Check, BACTEC, and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of MB-Check, BACTEC, and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria

C Abe et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Apr.

Abstract

The rate of recovery and time to the detection of mycobacteria from clinical specimens were measured for biphasic (MB-Check; Nippon Roche Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and radiometric (BACTEC; Nippon Becton Dickinson Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) liquid-based culture systems and egg-based media (3% Ogawa and Ogawa K). From the 245 sputum specimens processed, a total of 86 (35.1%) mycobacterial isolates were detected. Of these, 81 (94.2%) and 80 (93.0%) isolates were detected with the MB-Check and BACTEC systems, respectively, and 65 (75.6%) isolates were detected with the 3% Ogawa egg method. The difference in the percentages of positive cultures between the two systems based on liquid media and the 3% Ogawa egg method was significant (P less than 0.01). This difference was even greater among smear-negative specimens. The detection time was shorter with the liquid-based systems. The mean times to the detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex were 19.1 days with the MB-Check system, 13.4 days with the BACTEC system, and 21.7 days with the 3% Ogawa egg method. These results indicate that both the MB-Check and the BACTEC systems, based on liquid media, are efficient for the recovery of mycobacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kekkaku. 1989 Dec;64(12):801-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jul;26(7):1349-52 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Nov;22(5):841-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1288-91 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jun;9(6):428-31 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources