Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Feb;14(1):13-21.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.005082.

Exploring the impact of foreign direct investment on tobacco consumption in the former Soviet Union

Affiliations

Exploring the impact of foreign direct investment on tobacco consumption in the former Soviet Union

A B Gilmore et al. Tob Control. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Tobacco is the single largest cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world; in the former socialist bloc tobacco kills twice as many men as in the west. Although evidence shows that liberalisation of the cigarette trade through the elimination of import barriers leads to significant increases in consumption, far less is known about the impact of foreign direct investment on cigarette consumption. This paper seeks to explore the impact that the substantial transnational tobacco company investments have had on patterns of tobacco trade and consumption in the former Soviet Union.

Design: Routine data were used to explore trends in cigarette trade and consumption in the 15 countries of the former Soviet Union from the 1960s to the present day. Comparisons were made between trends in countries that have received substantial investment from the tobacco transnationals and countries that have not.

Results: Between 1991 and 2000 cigarette production increased by 96% in countries receiving industry investment and by 11% in countries that did not. Over the same period cigarette consumption increased by 40%; the increase was concentrated in countries receiving investments. Despite these investments, cigarette imports still outweigh exports and no trade surplus has yet to result.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that liberalisation of inward investment has a significant and positive impact on cigarette consumption and that without appropriate safeguards, market liberalisation may have long term negative impacts on health. Specific trade rules are needed to govern trade and investment in this uniquely harmful product. Implementation of effective tobacco control policies should precede tobacco industry privatisation. International financial organisations pressing for privatisation should ensure this occurs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):66-71 - PubMed
    1. Tob Control. 1998 Spring;7(1):22-6 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1998 Aug 1;317(7154):312-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 2004 Dec;94(12):2177-87 - PubMed
    1. Tob Control. 1999 Spring;8(1):75-80 - PubMed

Publication types