Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 15738009
- DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152341.31873.d9
Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether a single outpatient dose of intravaginal misoprostol (versus intracervical dinoprostone gel) reduces the oxytocin use for induction. Despite the numerous trials examining misoprostol for induction, the efficacy of a single outpatient dose of misoprostol followed by oxytocin induction is unknown.
Methods: Patients with a term, vertex, singleton pregnancy and a Bishop score of 6 or less were randomly assigned to receive misoprostol (n = 42, 0.25 microg intravaginally) or dinoprostone gel (n = 42, 0.5 mg intracervically) the evening before oxytocin induction. Patients were monitored for 3 hours after administration and discharged to home if fetal assessment was reassuring, for readmission the next morning for oxytocin. Primary outcomes were oxytocin dose, time, and dose intensity (dose divided by duration). Secondary outcomes were incidence of labor, uterine hyperstimulation, cesarean delivery, Apgar score. Statistics used were chi(2), Student t test, Mann-Whitney rank sum test, and Fisher exact test. P < .05 was accepted as statistically significant.
Results: A single dose of misoprostol significantly decreased the cumulative dose of oxytocin, the cumulative time of oxytocin administration, and the dose intensity of oxytocin (dose divided by time). Data are as follows (mean +/- standard error of the mean): oxytocin dose-dinoprostone 10,929 +/- 219 mU, misoprostol 6,081 +/- 170 mU, P = .008; oxytocin time-dinoprostone 798 +/- 11 minutes, misoprostol 531 +/- 11 minutes, P = .009; dose intensity-dinoprostone 11.3 +/- 0.1 mU/min, misoprostol 7.4 +/- 0.2 mU/min, P = .003. Misoprostol induced labor during the ripening period in 19 of 41 of patients, compared with 6 of 42 after dinoprostone (P = .002). There was no difference in cesarean delivery (dinoprostone, 8/42; misoprostol, 9/42; P = 1.00). There was no difference in short-term neonatal outcome. No patient had hyperstimulation or required cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal assessment during the ripening period.
Conclusion: A single dose of misoprostol administered in the outpatient setting significantly decreases oxytocin use, largely due to labor within the ripening period.
Similar articles
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 19034471 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.Tenn Med. 2001 Jan;94(1):25-7. Tenn Med. 2001. PMID: 11194687 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;276(2):119-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0313-1. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007. PMID: 17219155 Clinical Trial.
-
Vaginal misoprostol for term labor induction.Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Nov;31(11):1391-3. Ann Pharmacother. 1997. PMID: 9391696 Review.
-
A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening--a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings.J Perinat Med. 2005;33(6):491-9. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2005.087. J Perinat Med. 2005. PMID: 16318611 Review.
Cited by
-
Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;(8):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9:CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub3. PMID: 20687092 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 May 7;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-S1-S6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009. PMID: 19426469 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28901007 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 20927722 Free PMC article.
-
A Tribute to Nancy C. Chescheir, MD.Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan 1;137(1):1-2. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004215. Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33278282 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials