Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Mar 1;172(5):645-9.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040131.

Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit long-term care facilities: does type of ownership matter?

Margaret J McGregor  1 , Marcy Cohen, Kimberlyn McGrail, Anne Marie Broemeling, Reva N Adler, Michael Schulzer, Lisa Ronald, Yuri Cvitkovich, Mary Beck
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit long-term care facilities: does type of ownership matter?

Margaret J McGregor et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Currently there is a lot of debate about the advantages and disadvantages of for-profit health care delivery. We examined staffing ratios for direct-care and support staff in publicly funded not-for-profit and for-profit nursing homes in British Columbia.

Methods: We obtained staffing data for 167 long-term care facilities and linked these to the type of facility and ownership of the facility. All staff were members of the same bargaining association and received identical wages in both not-for-profit and for-profit facilities. Similar public funding is provided to both types of facilities, although the amounts vary by the level of functional dependence of the residents. We compared the mean number of hours per resident-day provided by direct-care staff (registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and resident care aides) and support staff (housekeeping, dietary and laundry staff) in not-for-profit versus for-profit facilities, after adjusting for facility size (number of beds) and level of care.

Results: The nursing homes included in our study comprised 76% of all such facilities in the province. Of the 167 nursing homes examined, 109 (65%) were not-for-profit and 58 (35%) were for-profit; 24% of the for-profit homes were part of a chain, and the remaining homes were owned by a single operator. The mean number of hours per resident-day was higher in the not-for-profit facilities than in the for-profit facilities for both direct-care and support staff and for all facility levels of care. Compared with for-profit ownership, not-for-profit status was associated with an estimated 0.34 more hours per resident-day (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.49, p < 0.001) provided by direct-care staff and 0.23 more hours per resident-day (95% CI 0.15-0.30, p < 0.001) provided by support staff.

Interpretation: Not-for-profit facility ownership is associated with higher staffing levels. This finding suggests that public money used to provide care to frail eldery people purchases significantly fewer direct-care and support staff hours per resident-day in for-profit long-term care facilities than in not-for-profit facilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: Publicly funded long-term care facilities in British Columbia included in the study. IC = intermediate care, IC & EC = intermediate and extended care.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Staffing levels for long-term care.
    Helfrich E. Helfrich E. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):467-8; author reply 468. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1050089. CMAJ. 2005. PMID: 16129855 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Tully P, Mohl C. Older residents of health care institutions. Health Rep 1995;7(3):27-30. - PubMed
    1. Ontario Health Coalition. Ownership matters — lessons from Ontario's long-term care facilities. Toronto: The Coalition; 2002. p. 1-17. Available: www.web.net/ohc/docs/may2702.htm (accessed 2005 Jan 24).
    1. Spector WD, Takada HA. Characteristics of nursing homes that affect resident outcomes. J Aging Health 1991;3(4):427-54. - PubMed
    1. Harrington C, Zimmerman D, Karon SL, Robinson J, Beutel P. Nursing home staffing and its relationship to deficiencies. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2000;55(5):S278-87. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Report to Congress: Appropriateness of minimum nurse staffing ratios in nursing homes phase II final report. Baltimore: The Centers; 2001. Available: www.cms.hhs.gov/medicaid/reports/rp1201home.asp (accessed 2003 June 30).

Publication types