Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Feb;7(1):109-14.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.109.

Accuracy of the modified Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) sensor in an outpatient setting: results from a diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Accuracy of the modified Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) sensor in an outpatient setting: results from a diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) study

Michael J Tansey et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: We previously reported the results of an inpatient accuracy study in children with type 1 diabetes using the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS, Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA). During the course of that study, a new process was implemented for manufacturing the CGMS sensor. Accuracy from the resulting modified sensor used by only 14 children was significantly better than the original version [median relative absolute difference (RAD), 11% vs. 19%; P < 0.001]. Baseline data from a subsequent outpatient study provide an opportunity to further assess the accuracy of the modified sensor in a much larger sample of children with type 1 diabetes.

Research design and methods: As part of a randomized trial to assess the utility of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (Cygnus, Inc., Redwood City, CA), 200 children with type 1 diabetes were instructed to wear a CGMS for 48-72 h in an outpatient setting at baseline. Glucose measurements from a OneTouch UltraSmart (Lifescan, Inc., Milpitas, CA) home glucose meter were downloaded and used as reference values to calculate accuracy measures.

Results: The overall median RAD was 12%. Accuracy was better during hyperglycemia than during hypoglycemia (median RAD, 10% vs. 20%; P < 0.001) and on optimal versus non-optimal days but did not vary significantly by the number of calibrations entered.

Conclusions: These data confirm the improved accuracy previously reported for the modified version of the CGMS sensor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of Accuracy for Original vs. Modified CGMS Sensors
Median 255 relative absolute difference (RAD) is plotted against the reference glucose value for each 256 sensor type.

References

    1. The Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. The accuracy of the CGMS in children with type 1 diabetes: results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) accuracy study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5:781–789. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. A Multicenter Study of the Accuracy of the OneTouch Ultra Home Glucose Meter in Children with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5:933–941. - PubMed
    1. International Organisation for Standardisation. Requirements for in vitro blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. Geneva, Switzerland: 2001.
    1. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
    1. Rheney CC, Kirk JK. Performance of Three Blood Glucose Meters. Ann Pharmocother. 2000;34:317–321. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms