Quality components of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) varieties
- PMID: 15740060
- DOI: 10.1021/jf0484125
Quality components of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) varieties
Abstract
The sensory quality and chemical constituents of juices from seven sea buckthorn (Hippophaerhamnoides L.) varieties were studied in two consecutive seasons. The juices were generally described as sour and astringent, with low sweetness and fruity flavor. The differences in sensory quality as well as in chemical composition between samples and years were significant (p < 0.05) in most parameters studied. The Chuiskaya variety was described as the sweetest, with the strongest fruity flavor, whereas the varieties Avgustinka, Botanicheskaya, Trofimovskaya, and Raisa were the sourest and most astringent. Total sugar (fructose and glucose) varied from 1.9 to 7.1 g/100 mL in juice, total acid (malic and quinic acids) from 3.1 to 5.1 g/100 mL, vitamin C from 29 to 176 mg/100 mL, and pulp oil from 0.7 to 3.6%. The soluble solids were between 7.4 and 12.6, the pH between 2.7 and 2.9, and the titrable acidity between 2.0 and 3.7. The redness was highest on Avgustinka and Raisa, but there were no differences in yellowness. Total sugar and the sugar/acid ratio correlated positively with sweetness and negatively with sourness and astringency, whereas total acid and titrable acidity correlated positively with sourness and astringency and negatively with sweetness.
Similar articles
-
Effects of genotype, latitude, and weather conditions on the composition of sugars, sugar alcohols, fruit acids, and ascorbic acid in sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides ssp. mongolica) berry juice.J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Mar 28;60(12):3180-9. doi: 10.1021/jf204577g. Epub 2012 Mar 19. J Agric Food Chem. 2012. PMID: 22397621
-
Fast analysis of sugars, fruit acids, and vitamin C in sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) varieties.J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Apr 5;54(7):2508-13. doi: 10.1021/jf053177r. J Agric Food Chem. 2006. PMID: 16569036
-
Sensory profile of ethyl β-d-glucopyranoside and its contribution to quality of sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.).Food Chem. 2017 Oct 15;233:263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.073. Epub 2017 Apr 13. Food Chem. 2017. PMID: 28530574
-
The flavor of pomegranate fruit: a review.J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Jan 15;94(1):21-7. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6311. Epub 2013 Aug 19. J Sci Food Agric. 2014. PMID: 23881410 Review.
-
Why is sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) so exceptional? A review.Food Res Int. 2020 Jul;133:109170. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109170. Epub 2020 Mar 17. Food Res Int. 2020. PMID: 32466930 Review.
Cited by
-
Genome expression analysis of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors in Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.).Front Plant Sci. 2024 Nov 20;15:1487960. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1487960. eCollection 2024. Front Plant Sci. 2024. PMID: 39634066 Free PMC article.
-
Phenolic compositions and antioxidant activities of Hippophae tibetana and H. rhamnoides ssp. sinensis berries produced in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.Food Chem X. 2022 Jul 20;15:100397. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100397. eCollection 2022 Oct 30. Food Chem X. 2022. PMID: 36211784 Free PMC article.
-
Explicating genetic diversity based on ITS characterization and determination of antioxidant potential in sea buckthorn (Hippophae spp.).Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Jun;49(6):5229-5240. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06619-z. Epub 2021 Aug 13. Mol Biol Rep. 2022. PMID: 34387804
-
Fatty acid composition of developing sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berry and the transcriptome of the mature seed.PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034099. Epub 2012 Apr 27. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22558083 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Berries of Some Sea Buckthorn Genotypes by Physicochemical Properties and Fatty Acid Content of the Seed.Plants (Basel). 2022 Dec 7;11(24):3412. doi: 10.3390/plants11243412. Plants (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36559525 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources