Hereditary melanoma and predictive genetic testing: why not?
- PMID: 15744786
- DOI: 10.1002/pon.901
Hereditary melanoma and predictive genetic testing: why not?
Abstract
Background: Since p16-Leiden presymptomatic testing for hereditary melanoma has become available in the Netherlands, the benefits and risks of offering such testing are evaluated. The current paper investigated why the non-participants were reluctant to participate in genetic testing.
Methods: Sixty six eligible individuals, who were knowledgeable about the test but had not participated in genetic testing by January 2003, completed a self-report questionnaire assessing motivation, anxiety, family dynamics, risk knowledge and causal attributions.
Results: Non-participants reported anxiety levels below clinical significance. A principal components analysis on reasons for non-participation distinguished two underlying motives: emotional and rational motivation. Rational motivation for non-participation was associated with more accurate risk knowledge, the inclination to preselect mutation carriers within the family and lower scores on anxiety. Emotional motivation for non-participation was associated with disease misperceptions, hesitation to communicate unfavourable test results within the family and higher scores on anxiety.
Conclusion: Rational and emotional motivation for non-participation in the genetic test for hereditary melanoma was found. Emotionally motivated individuals may be reluctant to disseminate genetic risk information. Rationally motivated individuals were better informed than emotionally motivated individuals. It is suggested that a leaflet is added to the invitation letter to enhance informed decision-making about genetic testing.
Similar articles
-
Genetic testing in familial melanoma: uptake and implications.Psychooncology. 2008 Aug;17(8):790-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.1377. Psychooncology. 2008. PMID: 18613292
-
Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Nov;55(2):265-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.002. Patient Educ Couns. 2004. PMID: 15530764
-
Anticipated uptake of genetic testing for familial melanoma in an Australian sample: An exploratory study.Psychooncology. 2007 Jan;16(1):69-78. doi: 10.1002/pon.1052. Psychooncology. 2007. PMID: 16874747
-
Genetic counselling and genetic testing in hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2009.02.009. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19414152 Review.
-
Management of familial melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer syndromes.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2009 Jan;18(1):73-98, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2008.08.003. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2009. PMID: 19056043 Review.
Cited by
-
Better the devil you know? High-risk individuals' anticipated psychological responses to genetic testing for melanoma susceptibility.J Genet Couns. 2006 Dec;15(6):433-47. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9038-3. J Genet Couns. 2006. PMID: 17103321
-
Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: family communication and motivation.Fam Cancer. 2016 Jan;15(1):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9842-8. Fam Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26446592 Free PMC article.
-
Underutilization of genetics services for autism: the importance of parental awareness and provider recommendation.J Genet Couns. 2012 Dec;21(6):803-13. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9494-x. Epub 2012 Mar 14. J Genet Couns. 2012. PMID: 22415587
-
A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.J Community Genet. 2013 Apr;4(2):233-42. doi: 10.1007/s12687-012-0134-9. Epub 2013 Jan 15. J Community Genet. 2013. PMID: 23319393 Free PMC article.
-
Management of melanoma families.Cancers (Basel). 2010 Apr 16;2(2):549-66. doi: 10.3390/cancers2020549. Cancers (Basel). 2010. PMID: 24281082 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical