Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification
- PMID: 15746684
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.028
Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification
Abstract
Objective: This study was undertaken to investigate the reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station by using a newly designed birth simulator.
Study design: This prospective study involved 32 residents and 25 attending physicians. Each operator was given all 11 possible fetal stations in random order. A fetal head mannequin was placed in 1 of the 11 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) stations (-5 to +5) in a birth simulator equipped with real-time miniaturized sensor. The operator then determined head position clinically using the ACOG classification. Head position was described as: (1) "engaged" or "nonengaged" (engagement code); (2) "high," "mid," "low," or "outlet" (group code); and (3) according to the 11 ACOG ischial spine stations (numerical code). Errors were defined as differences between the stations given by the sensor and by the operator. We determined the error rates for the 3 codes.
Results: "Numerical" errors occurred in 50% to 88% of cases for residents and in 36% to 80% of cases for attending physicians, depending on the position. The mean "group" error was 30% (95% CI 25%-35%) for residents and 34% (95% CI 27%-41%) for attending physicians. In most cases (87.5% for residents and 66.8% for attending physicians) of misdiagnosis of "high" station, the "mid" station was retained. Residents and attending physicians made an average of 12% of "engagement" errors, equally distributed between false diagnosis of engagement and nonengagement.
Conclusion: Our results show that transvaginal assessment of fetal head station is poorly reliable, meaning clinical training should be promoted. The choice not to perform vaginal delivery when the fetus is in the "mid" position strongly decreases the risk of applying instruments on an undiagnosed "high" station. Conversely, obstetricians who perform only "low" operative vaginal deliveries also deliver unrecognized "mid" station fetuses. Therefore, residency programs should offer training in "mid" pelvic operative vaginal deliveries. Birth simulators could be used in training programs.
Similar articles
-
[Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal head engagement. A preliminary French prospective study].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009 Oct;38(6):474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 28. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009. PMID: 19481367 French.
-
Determination of fetal head station and position during labor: a new technique that combines ultrasound and a position-tracking system.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):404.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.051. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19217593
-
Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):258-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 11896947
-
[Occipito-posterior fetal head position, maternal and neonatal outcome].Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Aug;59(4):459-64. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17923836 Review. Italian.
-
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009. Semin Perinatol. 2006. PMID: 17011400 Review.
Cited by
-
Oxytocin augmentation and neurotransmitters in prolonged delivery: An experimental appraisal.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Dec 23;21:100273. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100273. eCollection 2024 Mar. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023. PMID: 38274243 Free PMC article.
-
Transporting an Artificial Intelligence Model to Predict Emergency Cesarean Delivery: Overcoming Challenges Posed by Interfacility Variation.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 10;23(12):e28120. doi: 10.2196/28120. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34890352 Free PMC article.
-
Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery.BJOG. 2018 May;125(6):693-702. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14820. Epub 2017 Aug 21. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 28692173 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Sex, Age and Height on Symphysis-Ischial Spine Distance Measured on a Pelvic CT.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 24;11(9):2395. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092395. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35566521 Free PMC article.
-
Ecological association between operative vaginal delivery and obstetric and birth trauma.CMAJ. 2018 Jun 18;190(24):E734-E741. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171076. CMAJ. 2018. PMID: 29914910 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical