Similar articles

• Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates.

  Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Kochamba GS, Grunkemeier G, Khonsari S. Yun KL, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Mar;129(3):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.054. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005. PMID: 15746730 Clinical Trial.
• Current perspectives in endoscopic vessel harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting.

  Kempfert J, Rastan A, Leontyev S, Luduena M, Van Linden A, Arsalan M, Blumenstein J, Holzhey D, Lehmann S, Mohr FW, Walther T. Kempfert J, et al. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Nov;9(11):1481-8. doi: 10.1586/erc.11.151. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011. PMID: 22059796 Review.
• Carbon dioxide embolism induced by endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting during coronary artery bypass grafting.

  Mommerot A, Perrault LP. Mommerot A, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Dec;132(6):1502; author reply 1502-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.047. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 17141001 No abstract available.
• Statistical methodology for analysis of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques.

  Alameddine AK, Alimov VK, Engelman DT. Alameddine AK, et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;90(5):1743-4; author reply 1744. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.075. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20971315 No abstract available.
• Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus conventional vein harvesting.

  Reed JF 3rd. Reed JF 3rd. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2008 Dec;7(4):210-9. doi: 10.1177/1534734608324172. Epub 2008 Sep 24. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2008. PMID: 18815201 Review.