Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates
- PMID: 15746730
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.054
Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates
Abstract
Objective: We sought to compare the 6-month angiographic patency rates of greater saphenous veins removed during coronary artery bypass grafting with the endoscopic vein harvest or open vein harvest techniques.
Methods: Two hundred patients undergoing nonemergency on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively randomized to either endoscopic vein harvest or open vein harvest. Follow-up angiography of all vein grafts was scheduled at 6 months. Graft patency and disease grades were assigned independently by 2 interventional cardiologists. Leg wound healing was evaluated at discharge, 1 month, and 6 months for evidence of complications.
Results: There were 3 conversions from endoscopic vein harvest to open vein harvest because of vein factors. Leg wound complications were significantly lower in the endoscopic vein harvest group (7.4% vs 19.4%, P = .014). On multivariable analysis, endoscopic vein harvest emerged as the only factor affecting wound complications (odds ratio, 0.33). Three deaths (2 perioperative and 1 late) occurred in the endoscopic vein harvest group that were unrelated to vein graft closure. Twenty-four and 29 patients in the endoscopic vein harvest and open vein harvest cohorts, respectively, refused the follow-up 6-month angiography. Therefore a total of 144 angiograms (73 endoscopic vein harvests and 71 open vein harvests) and 336 vein grafts (166 endoscopic vein harvests and 170 open vein harvests) were available for analysis. The overall occlusion rates at 6 months were 21.7% for endoscopic vein harvest and 17.6% for open vein harvest. Additionally, there was evidence of significant disease (>50% stenosis) in 10.2% and 12.4% of endoscopic vein harvest and open vein harvest grafts, respectively. By means of ordinal hierarchic logistic regression, endoscopic vein harvest was not found to be a risk factor for vein graft occlusion or disease (odds ratio, 1.15). Significant predictors were congestive heart failure (odds ratio, 2.87), graft to the diagonal artery territory (odds ratio, 1.76), larger vein conduit size (odds ratio, 1.32), and graft flow (odds ratio, 0.90).
Conclusion: Endoscopic vein harvest reduces leg wound complications compared with open vein harvest without compromising the 6-month patency rate. The overall patency rate depends on target and vein-related variables and patient characteristics rather than the method of vein harvesting.
Comment in
-
Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: the good, the bad, and the ugly.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Mar;129(3):488-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.11.030. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005. PMID: 15746728 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.061. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20103309
-
Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(4):325-30. Heart Surg Forum. 2000. PMID: 11178296
-
Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Aug;34(2):384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.028. Epub 2008 May 27. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18508277 Clinical Trial.
-
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):266-70. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.222430. Epub 2009 Nov 26. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 19942633 Review.
-
Is it safe to perform endoscopic vein harvest?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):625-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227090. Epub 2010 Jan 25. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20100708 Review.
Cited by
-
Can preoperative myocardial perfusion scintigraphy predict changes in left ventricular perfusion and function after coronary artery bypass graft surgery?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;14(6):779-84. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs099. Epub 2012 Apr 2. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22473665 Free PMC article.
-
Twenty-Five Years of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Structural Observations and Impact on Graft Performance.Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):91-99. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0238. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 32270965 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Choice of vein-harvest technique for coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of the REGROUP trial.Clin Cardiol. 2014 Jun;37(6):325-30. doi: 10.1002/clc.22267. Epub 2014 Mar 14. Clin Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24633760 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Advances in preclinical surgical therapy of cardiovascular diseases.Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):4965-4975. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001534. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38701509 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of a risk score for early saphenous vein graft failure: An individual patient data meta-analysis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jul;160(1):116-127.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.07.086. Epub 2019 Aug 26. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 31606176 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources