Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK)
- PMID: 15747038
- DOI: 10.1007/s00392-005-0195-4
Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK)
Abstract
Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis seems to be on the doorstep of more widespread use. However, its feasibility and safety in clinical practice at a broad spectrum of hospitals needs to be determined.
Methods: We analyzed data of the prospective multi-centre Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) Registry of the German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).
Results: From 7/1996 to 5/2004 1888 patients from 28 hospitals were included in the CAS Registry. The median hospital stay from CAS until hospital discharge was 3 days (quartiles: 2-6 days). Median patients age was 70 years (quartiles: 64-76 years) with 72.1% males. CAS for symptomatic stenosis was performed in 55% of cases. Patients treated with CAS suffered from coronary artery disease in 66.5%, had arterial hypertension in 91.7%, hyperlipidemia in 86.3% and 34.2% were diabetics. The intended CAS procedure was completed in 98.1% of cases. A stent was implanted in 97.3% of completed cases. The median intervention time was 43 min (quartiles: 30-60 min). During the hospital stay death rate was 0.3% (5/1888) and the rate of ipsilateral stroke 3.2% (58/1840). A contralateral ischemic event occurred in 1.4% (26/ 1840) of patients. The combined rate of all death or strokes was 3.8% (70/1841). Between 1996 and 2004 there was a steady increase in the use of protection devices during CAS (0% in 1996 and 97.9% in 2004; p for trend <0.0001). There was also an increase in the proportion of patients treated for asymptomatic stenoses (p for trend <0.0001). We observed a decrease of the combined endpoint of death or stroke from 6.3% in 1996 to 1.9% in 2004 (p for trend=0.021).
Conclusion: The multi-centre ALKK CAS Registry data confirm the feasibility and shot-term safety of CAS even in daily clinical practice. There was a rapid penetration of the use of embolic protection devices, an increase in treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenoses and a decrease in acute complication rates from 1996 to 2004.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of minor versus major stroke during carotid artery stenting: results from the carotid artery stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 May;103(5):345-51. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0657-z. Epub 2014 Jan 11. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24414075
-
Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul 1;74(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22050. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19360877
-
Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice: does sex matter? Results from the carotid artery stenting registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Clin Cardiol. 2012 Feb;35(2):111-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.21015. Epub 2012 Jan 13. Clin Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22246970 Free PMC article.
-
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022. Am J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18154764 Review.
-
Advantages and indications of transcervical carotid artery stenting with carotid flow reversal.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2005 Jun;46(3):229-39. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2005. PMID: 15956920 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of endovascular expertise in carotid artery stenting: results from the ALKK-CAS-Registry in 5,535 patients.Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Nov;101(11):929-37. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0479-4. Epub 2012 May 30. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22645102
-
[Position paper on the indication for and implementation of interventional treatment of extracranial carotid stenosis].Clin Res Cardiol. 2006;95 Suppl 4:85-91. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-2004-0. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16598610 German. No abstract available.
-
Carotid artery interventions for restenosis after prior stenting: is it different from interventions of de novo lesions? Results from the carotid artery stent (CAS)--registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Dec;99(12):809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0188-9. Epub 2010 Jul 2. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20596714
-
Carotid intervention 3: the evidence for cerebral protection.Semin Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jun;24(2):234-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-980046. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2007. PMID: 21326801 Free PMC article.
-
Stent-supported angioplasty versus endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis: evidence from current randomized trials.Z Kardiol. 2005 Dec;94(12):836-43. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-0311-5. Z Kardiol. 2005. PMID: 16382386
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources