How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?
- PMID: 15747073
- DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0851-1
How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?
Abstract
Purpose: Preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy is currently the main neoadjuvant therapy used to treat locally advanced middle and low rectal adenocarcinoma. A restaging work-up with magnetic resonance imaging was hoped to provide information about the effects related to combined chemoradiotherapy. The goal was to evaluate the correlation between pathologically verified tumor stages and clinical stages predicted by magnetic resonance imaging after combined chemoradiotherapy.
Methods: Between August 2000 and June 2003, 50 patients with biopsy-proven middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma, with initial stage T3-T4 or N+, M0, were recruited in this series. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was used to stage the tumor before and after combined chemoradiotherapy. A protocol of the standard external radiation dose and oral combined uracil and 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin was used. The results of magnetic resonance imaging restaging after combined chemoradiotherapy were correlated with the pathologic staging.
Results: The overall predictive accuracy in T stage was 52 percent, whereas overstaging and understaging occurred in 38 percent and 10 percent of patients, respectively. Most of the inaccurate T staging was a result of the overstaging of superficial tumors (T0-T2). In N stage, accurate staging was noted in 68 percent of all patients, whereas 24 percent were overstaged and 8 percent were understaged.
Conclusion: In restaging irradiated tumors, magnetic resonance imaging had the accuracy of 52 percent in T stage and 68 percent in N stage. Poor agreement between post-combined chemoradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging was observed in both T (k = 0.017) and N (k = 0.031) stages. Most of the inaccuracy in both T and N stages was caused by overstaging. The problem with magnetic resonance imaging was believed to be that it could not completely differentiate fibrosis from viable residual tumors.
Similar articles
-
Is final TNM staging a predictor for survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy?Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2766-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9471-z. Epub 2007 Jun 6. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17551794
-
cT3N0 rectal cancer: potential overtreatment with preoperative chemoradiotherapy is warranted.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 20;26(3):368-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5434. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18202411
-
Is decrease of tumor volume correlated with stage change after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy?Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 May-Jun;52(63):765-9. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005. PMID: 15966201
-
[Histologic response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal adenocarcinoma: own experience and review of the literature].Orv Hetil. 2006 Oct 22;147(42):2011-20. Orv Hetil. 2006. PMID: 17165600 Review. Hungarian.
-
Rectal cancer: primary staging and assessment after chemoradiotherapy.Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jul;21(3):169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.02.002. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21645861 Review.
Cited by
-
¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-based treatment response evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective validation of long-term outcomes.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 May;40(5):657-67. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2341-y. Epub 2013 Feb 23. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23436067 Clinical Trial.
-
Transanal endoscopic surgery in rectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 7;20(33):11538-45. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11538. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25206260 Free PMC article. Review.
-
DCE-MRI time-intensity curve visual inspection to assess pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Oct;36(10):611-621. doi: 10.1007/s11604-018-0760-1. Epub 2018 Jul 23. Jpn J Radiol. 2018. PMID: 30039258
-
Current trends in staging rectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 21;17(7):828-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.828. World J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21412492 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic and MRI response evaluation following neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: a pictorial review with matched MRI, endoscopic, and pathologic examples.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 May;46(5):1783-1804. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02827-6. Epub 2020 Oct 28. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021. PMID: 33111189 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical