Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct;34(4):559-73.
doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0271-y.

Hydrochemical buffer assessment in agricultural landscapes: from local to catchment scale

Affiliations

Hydrochemical buffer assessment in agricultural landscapes: from local to catchment scale

Valérie Viaud et al. Environ Manage. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Non-point-source pollution of surface and groundwater is a prominent environmental issue in rural catchments, with major consequences on water supply and aquatic ecosystem quality. Among surface-water protection measures, environmental or landscape management policies support the implementation and the management of buffer zones. Although a great number of studies have focused on buffer zones, quantification of the buffer effect is still a recurring question. The purpose of this article is a critical review of the assessment of buffer-zone functioning. Our objective is to provide land planners and managers with a set of variables to assess the limits and possibilities for quantifying buffer impact at the catchment scale. We first consider the scale of the local landscape feature. The most commonly used empirical method for assessing buffers is to calculate water/nutrient budgets from inflow-outflow monitoring at the level of landscape structures. We show that several other parameters apart from mean depletion of flux can be used to describe buffer functions. Such parameters include variability, with major implication for water management. We develop a theoretical framework to clarify the assessment of the buffer effect and propose a systematic analysis taking account of temporal variability. Second, we review the current assessment of buffer effects at the catchment scale according to the theoretical framework established at the local scale. Finally, we stress the limits of direct empirical assessment at the catchment scale and, in particular, we emphasize the hierarchy in hydrological processes involved at the catchment scale: The landscape feature function is constrained by other factors (climate and geology) that are of importance at a broader spatial and temporal scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Environ Manage. 2001 Nov;28(5):577-98 - PubMed
    1. Environ Pollut. 2002;117(1):165-8 - PubMed
    1. J Environ Qual. 2002 May-Jun;31(3):1025-37 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1978 Jul 21;201(4352):229-34 - PubMed
    1. Water Res. 2001 Oct;35(14):3462-72 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources