Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004:102:269-303.

Computerized expert system for evaluation of automated visual fields from the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial: methods, baseline fields, and six-month longitudinal follow-up

Steven E Feldon  1
Affiliations

Computerized expert system for evaluation of automated visual fields from the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial: methods, baseline fields, and six-month longitudinal follow-up

Steven E Feldon. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004.

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a computerized expert system evaluating visual fields in a prospective clinical trial, the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial (IONDT). To identify the pattern and within-pattern severity of field defects for study eyes at baseline and 6-month follow-up.

Design: Humphrey visual field (HVF) change was used as the outcome measure for a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial to test the null hypothesis that optic nerve sheath decompression was ineffective in treating nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and to ascertain the natural history of the disease.

Methods: An expert panel established criteria for the type and severity of visual field defects. Using these criteria, a rule-based computerized expert system interpreted HVF from baseline and 6-month visits for patients randomized to surgery or careful follow-up and for patients who were not randomized.

Results: A computerized expert system was devised and validated. The system was then used to analyze HVFs. The pattern of defects found at baseline for patients randomized to surgery did not differ from that of patients randomized to careful follow-up. The most common pattern of defect was a superior and inferior arcuate with central scotoma for randomized eyes (19.2%) and a superior and inferior arcuate for nonrandomized eyes (30.6%). Field patterns at 6 months and baseline were not different. For randomized study eyes, the superior altitudinal defects improved (P = .03), as did the inferior altitudinal defects (P = .01). For nonrandomized study eyes, only the inferior altitudinal defects improved (P = .02). No treatment effect was noted.

Conclusions: A novel rule-based expert system successfully interpreted visual field defects at baseline of eyes enrolled in the IONDT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequence developed to facilitate derivation of the rules used for classification system for visual fields.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Location and decibel loss at each of 52 data points on the total deviation plot.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ischemic Optic Nerve Decompression Trial Group. The Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial (IONDT): design and methods. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:276–296. - PubMed
    1. Ischemic Optic Nerve Decompression Trial Research Group. Optic nerve decompression surgery for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is not effective and may be harmful. JAMA. 1995;273:625–632. - PubMed
    1. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Beck RW, et al. Quality control functions of the Visual Field Reading Center (VFRC) for the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) Control Clin Trials. 1995;14:143–159. - PubMed
    1. Katz J, Congdon N, Friedman D. Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1137–1142. - PubMed
    1. Molino G, Marzuoli M, Molino F, et al. Validation of ICTERUS, a knowledge-based expert system for jaundice diagnosis. Methods Inf Med. 2000;39:311–318. - PubMed

Publication types