Participatory action research: considerations for ethical review
- PMID: 15748680
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.004
Participatory action research: considerations for ethical review
Abstract
This paper addresses the distinctive nature of participatory action research (PAR) in relation to ethical review requirements. As a framework for conducting research and reducing health disparities, PAR is gaining increased attention in community and public health research. As a result, PAR researchers and members of Research Ethics Boards could benefit from an increased understanding of the array of ethical concerns that can arise. We discuss these concerns in light of commonly held ethical requirements for clinical research (social or scientific value, scientific validity, fair subject/participant selection, favourable risk-benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent, and respect for potential and enrolled participants) and refer to guidelines specifically developed for participatory research in health promotion. We draw from our community-based experiences in mental health promotion research with immigrant and culturally diverse youth to illustrate the ethical advantages and challenges of applying a PAR approach. We conclude with process suggestions for Research Ethics Boards.
Similar articles
-
Clinical research with healthy volunteers: an ethical framework.J Investig Med. 2003 Feb;51 Suppl 1:S2-5. J Investig Med. 2003. PMID: 12664947
-
Ethical aspects of research into the etiology of autism.Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9(1):48-53. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10059. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003. PMID: 12587138 Review.
-
The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?NCEHR Commun. 2004 Spring;12(2):11-22. NCEHR Commun. 2004. PMID: 15460563 No abstract available.
-
Ethical issues in participatory action research.Scand J Caring Sci. 2004 Sep;18(3):333-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00277.x. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004. PMID: 15355529 Review.
-
Doing participant observation in a psychiatric hospital-- research ethics resumed.Soc Sci Med. 2007 Dec;65(11):2296-306. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Aug 31. Soc Sci Med. 2007. PMID: 17765376
Cited by
-
Research with groups: group rights, group consent, and collaborative research commentary on "Protecting the Navajo People through tribal regulation of research".Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jul;12(3):511-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0049-0. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006. PMID: 16909153 No abstract available.
-
Advancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnesses.Trials. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1878-7. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28388937 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fitting a square peg in a round hole? A mixed-methods study on research ethics and collaborative health and social care research involving 'vulnerable' groups.Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Apr 1;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01290-3. Health Res Policy Syst. 2025. PMID: 40170089 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical dilemmas in community-based participatory research: recommendations for institutional review boards.J Urban Health. 2007 Jul;84(4):478-93. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7. J Urban Health. 2007. PMID: 17436114 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding community-based processes for research ethics review: a national study.Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S359-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.194340. Epub 2010 Dec 16. Am J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21164086 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials