Evaluation of a point-of-care test, BVBlue, and clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
- PMID: 15750100
- PMCID: PMC1081297
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1304-1308.2005
Evaluation of a point-of-care test, BVBlue, and clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
Abstract
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) remains the most common cause of abnormal vaginal discharge in women of reproductive age and is associated with increased susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted infections and preterm delivery. Present diagnostic methods require access to microscopy and laboratory expertise; however, the majority of women, particularly those in populations with a high prevalence of BV, do not have access to clinical services with on-site microscopy capabilities. We evaluated a point-of-care test for the diagnosis of BV, the BVBlue test, with 288 women attending a sexual health service with symptoms of abnormal vaginal discharge and/or odor. The BVBlue test performed well compared with conventional diagnostic methods for the assessment of women with symptoms suggestive of BV at the bedside and significantly better than other simple tests, such as vaginal pH determination and the amine test, that do not require microscopy. The BVBlue test was sensitive (88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 81 to 93%) and specific (95%; 95% CI, 91 to 98%) compared to the method of Nugent et al. (R. P. Nugent, M. A. Krohn, and S. L. Hillier, J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:297-301, 1991) and performed well compared with the method of Amsel et al. (R. Amsel, P. A. Totten, C. A. Spiegel, K. C. Chen, D. Eschenbach, and K. K. Holmes, Am. J. Med. 74:14-22, 1983), with a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 81 to 93%) and a specificity of 91% (95% CI, 85 to 94%). The BVBlue test is a simple, rapid, and objective test for the diagnosis of BV and has the potential to facilitate prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment of BV in the absence of microscopy. The majority of women at the greatest risk for the sequelae of BV are not in settings where the conventional diagnostic methods are either practical or possible, and they would greatly benefit from access to rapid and reliable point-of-care tests to improve the diagnosis and management of BV.
Comment in
-
Can chlamydial cervicitis influence diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis?J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Sep;43(9):4914-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4914-4915.2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16145176 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[Evaluation of Nugent and Amsel criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].Rev Med Chil. 2000 Jul;128(7):767-71. Rev Med Chil. 2000. PMID: 11050838 Spanish.
-
BVBLUE test for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women attending antenatal care at Phramongkutklao Hospital.J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Nov;88 Suppl 3:S7-13. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005. PMID: 16858939 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of BV(®) Blue Test Kit for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.Sex Reprod Healthc. 2011 Jan;2(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Nov 18. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2011. PMID: 21147452
-
Bacterial vaginosis--a laboratory and clinical diagnostics enigma.APMIS. 2005 Mar;113(3):153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm1130301.x. APMIS. 2005. PMID: 15799757 Review.
-
BVBlue as a diagnostic instrument for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review.BMC Womens Health. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03615-4. BMC Womens Health. 2025. PMID: 40022063 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Can chlamydial cervicitis influence diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis?J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Sep;43(9):4914-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4914-4915.2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16145176 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
State of the Art for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis.J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Aug 23;61(8):e0083722. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00837-22. Epub 2023 May 18. J Clin Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37199636 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of nursing intervention on patients with recurrent bacterial vaginosis treated with sucrose gel.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 11;103(41):e40121. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040121. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39465810 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Bacterial vaginosis.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00626-1. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025. PMID: 40537474 Review.
-
Quantitation of all Four Gardnerella vaginalis Clades Detects Abnormal Vaginal Microbiota Characteristic of Bacterial Vaginosis More Accurately than Putative G. vaginalis Sialidase A Gene Count.Mol Diagn Ther. 2019 Feb;23(1):139-147. doi: 10.1007/s40291-019-00382-5. Mol Diagn Ther. 2019. PMID: 30721449 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amsel, R., P. A. Totten, C. A. Spiegel, K. C. Chen, D. Eschenbach, and K. K. Holmes. 1983. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 74:14-22. - PubMed
-
- Cauci, S., J. Hitti, C. Noonan, K. Agnew, F. Quadrifoglio, S. L. Hillier, and D. A. Eschenbach. 2002. Vaginal hydrolytic enzymes, immunoglobulin A against Gardnerella vaginalis toxin, and risk of early preterm birth among women in preterm labor with bacterial vaginosis or intermediate flora. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 187:877-881. - PubMed
-
- Cohen, C. R., A. Duerr, N. Pruithithada, S. Rugpao, S. Hillier, P. Garcia, and K. Nelson. 1995. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV seroprevalence among female commercial sex workers in Chiang Mai, Thailand. AIDS 9:1093-1097. - PubMed
-
- Govender, L., A. A. Hoosen, J. Moodley, P. Moodley, and A. W. Sturm. 1996. Bacterial vaginosis and associated infections in pregnancy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 55:23-28. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical