Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):27-31.

The effect of adjunctive Mitomycin C in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15751236
Comparative Study

The effect of adjunctive Mitomycin C in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation

E Kurnaz et al. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive mitomycin C (MMC) in Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation for refractory glaucoma.

Methods: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients who underwent AGV implantation with adjunctive MMC (0.5 mg/ml) for 3 minutes (Group A) were compared to a control group of 26 eyes of 26 patients (Group B) who received AGV implantation without MMC. Nine patients were female and 13 patients were male in Group A and 11 patients were female and 15 patients were male in Group B. The mean age was 56 years ranging from 13 to 77 in Group A and 58 ranging from 14 to 71 years in Group B. Success was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) between 4 and 21 mmHg with or without glaucoma medication and with no additional glaucoma surgery, phthisis, or loss of light perception.

Results: The probability of success at 1 year was 86.36% and 80.76% in Group A and Group B, respectively. The number of glaucoma medications decreased from 2.82 to 0.56 in Group A and from 2.65 to 0.73 in Group B. Postoperative hypotony as an early complication was higher in Group A (31.81% in Group A and 15.38% in Group B). As a late postoperative complication, tube exposure developed in 3 patients (13.63%) in Group A and no such complication was seen in Group B. There was no statistically significant difference in success and complication rates between the two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Although adjunctive MMC in AGV implantation is safe and effective, it may not offer a better chance of surgical success compared with AGV implantation without MMC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms