Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 15752403
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00613.x
Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Background: The precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not previously been determined. A priori we suspected that the precision would be lower in patients with AF than in patients with sinus rhythm (SR). Consequently, we also determined if the precision could be improved by injecting the thermal indicator into the right ventricle instead of the right atrium.
Methods: Cardiac output was determined as the average result of four injections of 10 ml of iced saline. Replicate measurements were performed with thermal indicator injections into the right atrium and ventricle. The coefficients of variation and the precisions were calculated.
Results: In the 25 patients with AF, mean cardiac output was 3.96 l min(-1) (range 2.4-7.4), the coefficient of variation 0.073 (95% CI +/- 0.011), and the precision 0.38 l min(-1) (95% CI +/- 0.14) with injection into the right atrium. In the 25 patients with SR, mean cardiac output was 4.73 l min(-1) (range 2.4-7.3), the coefficient of variation 0.047(95% CI +/- 0.006), and the precision 0.38 l min(-1) (95% CI +/- 0.14). In both groups, an agreement analysis demonstrated that the injection of indicator into the right ventricle resulted in a significantly higher cardiac output [AF+0.25 (95% CI +/- 0.15) l min(-1), SR+0.29 ( +/- 0.20) l min(-1)].
Conclusion: The coefficient of variation for cardiac output determinations is 55% higher in patients with AF. Two measurements, separated by time or intervention, must differ by 15% in AF patients and 9% in SR patients before one can be 95% confident that a real change has taken place.
Similar articles
-
Cardiac output--pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Oct;50(9):1044-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01080.x. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006. PMID: 16987334 Clinical Trial.
-
Thermodilution cardiac output--are three injections enough?Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Nov;48(10):1322-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00514.x. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004. PMID: 15504196 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Oct;21(5):632-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Apr 5. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007. PMID: 17905265
-
Effects of injectate volume on thermodilution measurements of cardiac output in patients with low ventricular ejection fraction.Am J Crit Care. 1999 Mar;8(2):86-92. Am J Crit Care. 1999. PMID: 10071698 Review.
-
A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM).Anaesthesia. 2012 Nov;67(11):1266-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07311.x. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Anaesthesia. 2012. PMID: 22928650 Review.
Cited by
-
Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R85. doi: 10.1186/cc10083. Epub 2011 Mar 7. Crit Care. 2011. PMID: 21385348 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility and influence of hTEE monitoring on postoperative management in cardiac surgery patients.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Oct;31(7):1327-35. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0689-8. Epub 2015 Jun 6. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26047772
-
Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique.Intensive Care Med. 2009 Mar;35(3):498-504. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1292-4. Epub 2008 Sep 18. Intensive Care Med. 2009. PMID: 18802681
-
Perioperative Management of Elderly Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: The Contribution of Anesthesia.Visc Med. 2017 Aug;33(4):267-274. doi: 10.1159/000475611. Epub 2017 Aug 11. Visc Med. 2017. PMID: 29034255 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differences in Direct Fick and Thermodilution Measurements of Cardiac Output: Impact on Pulmonary Hypertension Classification.Pulm Circ. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):e70053. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70053. eCollection 2025 Jan. Pulm Circ. 2025. PMID: 40017790 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous