Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 May;15(5):884-94.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2652-x. Epub 2005 Mar 8.

Radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors

Affiliations
Review

Radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors

Elisabetta Buscarini et al. Eur Radiol. 2005 May.

Abstract

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumors was first proposed in 1990. New technologies enable us to produce liver thermal lesions of approximately 3-3.5 cm in diameter; RFA has consequently become an emerging percutaneous therapeutic option both for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and for non-resectable liver metastases, mainly from colorectal cancer. New devices (for example, triplet of cooled needles, wet needles) and combined therapies (tumor ischemia and RFA) have made it possible to treat large tumors. RFA can be carried out by a percutaneous, laparoscopic or laparotomic approach. Percutaneous RFA can be performed with local anaesthesia and mild sedation; deep sedation or general anaesthesia are also used. The guidance system is generally represented by ultrasound. CT or MR examinations are the more sensitive tests for assessing therapeutic results. The series of patients treated with RFA allow the technique to be considered as effective and safe, achieving a relatively high rate of cure in properly selected cases; it should be classified as curative/effective treatment for HCC, replacing percutaneous ethanol injection. The complication rate of RFA is low but not negligible; key elements in a strategy to minimize them are identified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(5):852-4 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2000 Sep;232(3):381-91 - PubMed
    1. Oncol Rep. 2002 Sep-Oct;9(5):1059-62 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 2003 Jan-Feb;23(1):123-34; discussion 134-6 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 1990 Mar;25(3):267-70 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources