[Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany--an update]
- PMID: 15754232
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-832406
[Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany--an update]
Abstract
Aim: The results of a national survey from 1998 had shown at the time that only around 10 % of orthopaedic surgeons in Germany had strictly implemented modern cementing techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The same study was repeated 5 years later to evaluate the current situation and to determine whether modern cementing techniques have become more popular.
Methods: A detailed, slightly modified questionnaire regarding cement and bone preparation, cementing techniques on acetabulum and femur, and implant types was sent to 572 German orthopaedic and trauma hospitals, as well as to visiting surgeons with an interest in THA. In total, 293 questionnaires were available for evaluation and statistical analysis.
Results: Palacos bone cement remained the most widely used cement (> 90 %). The mixing times given varied significantly. Vacuum mixing systems had become more popular (67.9 %). In the femur 81.8 % of the surgeons attempted to preserve cancellous bone and 57.2 % used pulsatile lavage (jet-lavage). Retrograde cement application via a cement gun was done in 71.1 %. Cement restrictors were used in more than 95 %. Only two-thirds of the surgeons implemented sustained cement pressurisation and preferred a cement mantle thickness > 2mm (64 %). Only 16.9 % made multiple small acetabular keyholes and 48.6 % used jet-lavage. In 73.1 % no cement gun was used and in 68.3 % the cement was applied at high viscosity. Manual cement pressurisation was done in 58.1 %. The Muller straight stem device remained the most popular implant. For only 5 of the over 50 stem designs implanted have long-term results been published as yet. Only 10.6 % of surgeons/centres performed > 20 and almost 50 % implanted > 100 cemented THAs/year.
Conclusion: The results of this survey demonstrated that, in comparison to 1998, the current state of cemented THA, in particular cementing technique has significantly improved. Future emphasis should be on continued surgeon education and training, as the operative, i. e., cementing techniques are of utmost importance for long-term success.
Similar articles
-
[Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany - update 2010].Z Orthop Unfall. 2012 Jun;150(3):309-17. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298261. Epub 2012 Feb 21. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012. PMID: 22354443 German.
-
[Status of cementation technique in total hip endoprostheses in Germany].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1999 Mar-Apr;137(2):101-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039342. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1999. PMID: 10408051 German.
-
Current practice in primary total hip replacement: results from the National Hip Replacement Outcome Project.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998 Sep;80(5):350-5. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998. PMID: 9849338 Free PMC article.
-
Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.Orthopedics. 2009 Sep;32(9):orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=42839. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-16. Orthopedics. 2009. PMID: 19751012 Review.
-
New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Feb;76(315):3-82. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005. PMID: 15790289 Review.
Cited by
-
The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future.Int J Nanomedicine. 2017 Feb 14;12:1227-1249. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S121956. eCollection 2017. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017. PMID: 28243086 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Revision of tibial TKA components: bone loss is independent of cementing type and technique: an in vitro cadaver study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jan 10;12:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011. PMID: 21219621 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical