Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts
- PMID: 15755239
- DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.195
Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts
Abstract
Do humans integrate experience on specific routes into metric survey knowledge of the environment, or do they depend on a simpler strategy of landmark navigation? The authors tested this question using a novel shortcut paradigm during walking in a virtual environment. The authors find that participants could not take successful shortcuts in a desert world but could do so with dispersed landmarks in a forest. On catch trials, participants were drawn toward the displaced landmarks whether the landmarks were clustered near the target location or along the shortcut route. However, when landmarks appeared unreliable, participants fell back on coarse survey knowledge. Like honeybees (F. C. Dyer, 1991), humans do not appear to derive accurate cognitive maps from path integration to guide navigation but, instead, depend on landmarks when they are available.
Similar articles
-
Humans do not switch between path knowledge and landmarks when learning a new environment.Psychol Res. 2007 May;71(3):240-51. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0080-4. Epub 2006 Sep 7. Psychol Res. 2007. PMID: 16957956
-
Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments.Anim Cogn. 2009 Mar;12(2):237-47. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0182-z. Epub 2008 Sep 3. Anim Cogn. 2009. PMID: 18766392
-
Wormholes in virtual space: From cognitive maps to cognitive graphs.Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:152-163. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 31. Cognition. 2017. PMID: 28577445
-
Traveling in clutter: navigation in the Central Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti.Behav Processes. 2009 Mar;80(3):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Behav Processes. 2009. PMID: 19049857 Review.
-
Cognitive maps and attention.Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:181-94. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17610-0. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19733757 Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptual organization and artificial attention for visual landmarks detection.Cogn Process. 2013 Mar;14(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0536-y. Epub 2013 Jan 18. Cogn Process. 2013. PMID: 23328946
-
Modelling human visual navigation using multi-view scene reconstruction.Biol Cybern. 2013 Aug;107(4):449-64. doi: 10.1007/s00422-013-0558-2. Epub 2013 Jun 19. Biol Cybern. 2013. PMID: 23778937 Free PMC article.
-
Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information.Psychol Res. 2010 Nov;74(6):560-7. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0277-4. Epub 2010 Feb 24. Psychol Res. 2010. PMID: 20177902
-
The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge.Mem Cognit. 2011 May;39(4):686-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z. Mem Cognit. 2011. PMID: 21264583
-
Statistically Optimal Cue Integration During Human Spatial Navigation.Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1621-1642. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02254-w. Epub 2023 Apr 10. Psychon Bull Rev. 2023. PMID: 37038031 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources