Patient-reported outcome and quality of life instruments database (PROQOLID): frequently asked questions
- PMID: 15755325
- PMCID: PMC555954
- DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-12
Patient-reported outcome and quality of life instruments database (PROQOLID): frequently asked questions
Abstract
The exponential development of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures in clinical research has led to the creation of the Patient-Reported Outcome and Quality of Life Instruments Database (PROQOLID) to facilitate the selection process of PRO measures in clinical research. The project was initiated by Mapi Research Trust in Lyon, France. Initially called QOLID (Quality of Life Instruments Database), the project's purpose was to provide all those involved in health care evaluation with a comprehensive and unique source of information on PRO and HRQOL measures available through the Internet.PROQOLID currently describes more than 470 PRO instruments in a structured format. It is available in two levels, non-subscribers and subscribers, at http://www.proqolid.org. The first level is free of charge and contains 14 categories of basic useful information on the instruments (e.g. author, objective, original language, list of existing translations, etc.). The second level provides significantly more information about the instruments. It includes review copies of over 350 original instruments, 120 user manuals and 350 translations. Most are available in PDF format. This level is only accessible to annual subscribers. PROQOLID is updated in close collaboration with the instruments' authors on a regular basis. Fifty or more new instruments are added to the database annually.Today, all of the major pharmaceutical companies, prestigious institutions (such as the FDA, the NIH's National Cancer Institute, the U.S. Veterans Administration), dozens of universities, public institutions and researchers subscribe to PROQOLID on a yearly basis. More than 800 users per day routinely visit the database.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19900250
-
Impact of cancer occurrence on health-related quality of life: a longitudinal pre-post assessment.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Jan 9;2:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-4. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004. PMID: 14715085 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Russian translations for Cochrane.Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S112-3. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150713. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015. PMID: 26639688
-
Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure.JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;4(3):165-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.015. Epub 2016 Feb 10. JACC Heart Fail. 2016. PMID: 26874386 Review.
-
[Practical aspects for minimizing errors in the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of quality of life questionnaires].Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2013 Jul-Sep;78(3):159-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Aug 7. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2013. PMID: 23931869 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.Qual Life Res. 2015 Oct;24(10):2457-72. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0974-y. Epub 2015 May 27. Qual Life Res. 2015. PMID: 26012839 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Protocol for a Delphi consensus exercise to identify a core set of criteria for selecting health related outcome measures (HROM) to be used in primary health care.BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 4;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0831-5. BMC Fam Pract. 2018. PMID: 30185172 Free PMC article.
-
A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jan 21;14:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-8. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014. PMID: 24447633 Free PMC article.
-
Picture This: Presenting Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Research Study Results to Patients.Med Decis Making. 2018 Nov;38(8):994-1005. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18791177. Epub 2018 Aug 22. Med Decis Making. 2018. PMID: 30132393 Free PMC article.
-
A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 25;21(1):e12075. doi: 10.2196/12075. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 30681962 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D, Leidy NK, Marquis P, Revicki D, Rothman M, PRO Harmonization Group Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value Health. 2003;6:522–531. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.65309.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- The ERIQA Group Assessing Treatment Impact Using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs): Challenges in Study Design, Conduct and Analysis. Meeting Report (Paris, May 10-11, 2004) Patient-Reported Outcomes Newsletter. 2005;3:1–16.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources