Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy
- PMID: 1575829
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-999306
Removal of retained intrauterine contraceptive devices in pregnancy
Abstract
Using real-time ultrasound and clinical expertise gained from chorionic villus sampling, we describe a technique for ultrasound-guided intrauterine device removal in those cases in which the string is not visible. Utilizing a stone clamp for intrauterine manipulation, we were easily able to extract the device without interrupting the pregnancy. We concur with recent recommendations advocating all intrauterine devices can be removed if pregnancy termination is declined.
PIP: Physicians at leading hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts were able to remove a retained IUD from 3 women who were in their 1st trimester of pregnancy. They took cervical cultures to test for chlamydia, beta-hemolytic Streptococcus, and gonococcus before attempting to remove the IUD. They used a 3.5 MHz transducer from an Acuson 128 machine to perform a transabdominal ultrasound scan. The physicians used a transcervically introduced stone clamp to retrieve the IUD. The technique was like that used for transcervical chorionic villus sampling. The 1st case was a 36-year old gravida 3 with a copper-7 IUD whose string had disappeared from sight. She was 8 weeks' gestation. The IUD was laying below the gestational sac. She delivered a full-term healthy infant weighing 3348 gm. The 2nd patient was a 27-year old Chinese woman who had been pregnant before, but had no living children. She was 9 weeks' gestation and had a stringless metal ring IUD. It was in the lower uterus. She experienced some bleeding afterwards. She did not experience any difficulties during the rest of her pregnancy and delivered a full-term infant (2665 gm). The 3rd case was also a Chinese woman with a metal ring IUD. She was gravida 2 para 1 at 10 weeks' gestation. Like the other Chinese woman, the IUD was in the lower uterus. She experienced bleeding throughout the 1st trimester. Nevertheless, at 40 weeks' gestation, she had a healthy 2665 gm infant. This method is best accomplished by someone skilled in in utero manipulation as is done with chorionic villus sampling. The physicians recommend that other physicians should try to remove a retained IUD using this technique no matter its location, type, or the presence of a visible string or not, if the patient indeed wants to continue the pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device during the course of pregnancy: a case report.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):81-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.09.579. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19110186
-
Ectopic IUD complicating pregnancy. A case report.J Reprod Med. 2002 Jan;47(1):57-9. J Reprod Med. 2002. PMID: 11842789
-
Ultrasonographically guided intrauterine contraceptive device removal before chorionic villus sampling.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Aug;173(2):603-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90289-9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7645641
-
Transverse limb reduction and intrauterine device: case report and review of the literature.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Sep;12(3):294-7. doi: 10.1080/13625180701393611. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007. PMID: 17763269 Review.
-
Three consecutive recurrent ectopic pregnancies.East Afr Med J. 1993 Sep;70(9):592-4. East Afr Med J. 1993. PMID: 8181445 Review.
Cited by
-
Late miscarriage and intraamniotic candidiasis in a woman with a retained intrauterine contraceptive device.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1993;253(3):157-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02767335. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1993. PMID: 8250605
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical